Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of microscopic tissue parameters on the diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging experiment

Norris, David G.·2001·NMR in Biomedicine

Abstract

This review examines the way in which microscopic tissue parameters can affect MR experiments which are sensitive to diffusion. The interaction between the intra‐ and extravascular as well as that between the intra‐ and extracellular spaces is examined. Susceptibility gradients due to the presence of deoxyhemoglobin can cause diffusion‐induced signal losses which are significant in functional magnetic resonance experiments, particularly at higher main magnetic field strengths. This is also true of the fast response that manifests itself as an early negative signal change in functional magnetic resonance experiments. The fields surrounding paramagnetic vessels are described and the way in which diffusion in these fields contributes to functional signal changes is examined. Flow in the capillary bed can be a confounding factor in experiments which aim to examine the diffusion characteristics of extravascular water. It is potentially also a method for assessing capillary perfusion. The intravoxel incoherent motion experiment is described in terms of how significantly this effect can influence diffusion attenuation curves from water. The major models for describing water diffusion in tissue are presented, as are the main experimental results that have contributed to an understanding of the mechanisms of diffusion contrast. The widely accepted view that changes in the diffusion characteristics are caused by a shift of water to the intracellular space and a concomitant change in extracellular tortuosity is examined critically. More recent experiments that indicate that a reduction in the intracellular diffusion may occur simultaneously with the cell swelling are described and their compatibility with existing models discussed. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Abbreviations used: 2FDG‐6P fluor‐2‐deoxyglucose‐6‐phosphate ADC apparent diffusion coefficient BOLD blood oxygen level dependent CNS central nervous system CSF cerebro spinal fluid DTI diffusion tensor imaging DWI diffusion weighted imaging fMR functional magnetic resonance FR fast response IVCM intravoxel coherent motion IVIM intravoxel incoherent motion MCAO middle cerebral artery occlusion MRI magnetic resonance imaging NMDA N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate NMR nuclear magnetic resonance PFG pulsed field gradient rBF regional blood flow SGP short gradient pulse TE echo time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nbm.682

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Norris, D. G.
Venue
NMR in Biomedicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-04
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
77-93
ISSN
  • 0952-3480 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1492
OpenAlex
W2081192009
Cited by
213
References
7
FWCI
8.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of microscopic tissue parameters on the diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/nbm.682
The paper
Norris, D. G. (2001). The effects of microscopic tissue parameters on the diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging experiment. NMR in Biomedicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.682

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.