Cited by 31Health Education and ValidationCardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Patient Perspective of Arrhythmia Questionnaire

Open access
Wood, Kathryn A., Stewart, Anita L., Drew, Barbara J., Scheinman, Melvin M., Frolicher, Erika S.·2009·Research in Nursing & Health

Abstract

There are no disease-specific questionnaires to measure patient sensitive outcomes in arrhythmia patients. We report the development and preliminary psychometric testing of the Patient Perception of Arrhythmia Questionnaire (PPAQ). The PPAQ was developed using formative research, exploratory factor analysis, expert review, pilot study, and regression. The PPAQ measures frequency and duration of episodes, symptoms, impact on daily activities, and restricted activity days. After preliminary content validation, the sensitivity of the PPAQ was tested in 103 arrhythmia patients. The measures showed good sensitivity and reliability. Preliminary construct validation was supported by significant differences (p < .001) among groups of arrhythmia patients consistent with clinical patterns. Preliminary evidence from patients with supraventricular arrhythmias suggests that the questionnaire has acceptable psychometrics and could be useful in future studies of arrhythmia patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nur.20347

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jayam VK Calkins H Fuster v Alexander RW O'Rourke RA Roberts R King SB III Nash IS Supraventricular tachycardia: AV nodal reentry and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome Hurst's the heart 2008 11th ed. New York McGraw Hill 855 873
  2. Nunnally JC Bernstein IH Psychometric theory 1994 3rd ed New York McGraw-Hill

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wood, K. A., Stewart, A. L., Drew, B. J., Scheinman, M. M., & Frolicher, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Wood, Kathryn A.
Venue
Research in Nursing & Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-08-21
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
504-516
ISSN
  • 0160-6891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-240X
OpenAlex
W1970273256
Cited by
31
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research in Nursing & Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (T32NR007088)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
cardiac arrhythmias, patient-reported outcomes, questionnaire development, psychometric validation, supraventricular arrhythmias, symptom burden, restricted activity days, construct validity, content validity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Medical History Taking, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Tachycardia, Supraventricular, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review