Cited by 154Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsBody Composition Measurement Techniques

The visceral adiposity index as a predictor of insulin resistance in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Open access
Oh, Jee‐Young, Sung, Yeon‐Ah, Lee, Hye Jin·2013·Obesity

Abstract

Objective: Visceral fat accumulation is more strongly related to insulin resistance than to excess total adiposity. The visceral adiposity index (VAI) has recently been suggested as an indicator of the visceral adiposity measured by magnetic resonance imaging. To evaluate whether the VAI could replace visceral computed tomography (CT) scanning and predict insulin resistance in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) was presented. Design and Methods: One hundred and eighty Korean women aged 16‐41 years who were diagnosed with PCOS using the Rotterdam criteria were included. The VAI was derived from a formula using body mass index, waist circumference, triglycerides, and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol. Visceral adiposity was defined as a visceral fat area (VFA) measuring > 100 cm 2 by CT scanning. Insulin sensitivity was evaluated by insulin‐mediated glucose utilization (M value), which was obtained using a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. Results: The VAI positively correlated with VFA, the visceral‐to‐subcutaneous fat ratio, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and negatively correlated with the M value. In a linear regression analysis, the VAI was an independent determinant of the insulin sensitivity after controlling for age, systolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and testosterone levels. In a logistic regression analysis, the VAI odds ratio was 3.5 (95% CI 1.2‐9.8) for predicting visceral adiposity after controlling for the various metabolic parameters and testosterone. Conclusion: The VAI can replace visceral CT scanning as a marker for visceral adiposity, and it predicts insulin resistance in young women with PCOS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.20096

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oh, J., Sung, Y., & Lee, H. J.
Affiliations
Ewha Womans University (KR)
Corresponding author
Oh, Jee‐Young
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-13
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
1690-1694
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W1538464857
Cited by
154
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6
FWCI
15.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
visceral adiposity index, insulin resistance, polycystic ovary syndrome, visceral fat, insulin sensitivity, visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio, young women, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, visceral fat area, blood pressure, testosterone
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Cholesterol, HDL, Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Triglycerides, Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed, Body Mass Index, Linear Models, Asian People, Subcutaneous Fat, Intra-Abdominal Fat, Adiposity, Waist Circumference, Young Adult, Republic of Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review