Cited by 71Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases

Association of fat to lean mass ratio with metabolic dysfunction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Open access
Ezeh, U., Pall, M., Mathur, R., Azziz, R.·2014·Human Reproduction

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Are differences in metabolic dysfunction between polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and control women related to differences in their fat to lean mass (F/L) ratio? SUMMARY ANSWER: Compared with controls of similar body mass index (BMI), women with PCOS demonstrate adverse body composition characterized by increased whole body fat relative to lean mass (i.e. a higher F/L ratio), which is associated with differences in metabolic dysfunction between the two groups. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Previous studies examining body composition and insulin resistance (IR) in PCOS have yielded conflicting results. Excess total fat mass (i.e. fat mass index [fat BMI]) correlates with IR, whereas increased total lean mass (i.e. lean BMI) has been associated with higher insulin sensitivity. However, the role of the F/L ratio, which integrates the antagonistic effects of both fat and lean mass depots, on IR in PCOS, has not been investigated. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of 120 women between the ages of 22-44 years to study the relation of the F/L ratio with measures of insulin action and secretion in both steady and dynamic states. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Sixty PCOS (by NIH, 1990 criteria) and 60 control (age, race and BMI-matched) women were prospectively studied for body composition (by bioelectrical impedance analysis [BIA]) and basal IR and insulin secretion by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR and HOMA-%β-cell function, respectively) in a tertiary care academic referral center. A subset of 12 PCOS and 12 matched control women also underwent a modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT) to determine glucose uptake and insulin secretion in dynamic state. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Our results indicate that women with PCOS demonstrated greater degrees of hyperandrogenism, and higher waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), %body fat, fat BMI, F/L, fasting insulin levels, and HOMA-IR and HOMA-%β-cell values, than controls. In models adjusted for WHR and free testosterone and diagnostic groups, fasting insulin levels, HOMA-IR, and HOMA-%beta cell function were positively related to the F/L ratio. A positive relationship was also found in both study groups between F/L and the FSIVGTT measures insulin sensitivity (Si) and acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg). The F/L tended to negatively correlate with glucose effectiveness or non-insulin-mediated glucose transport (Sg) only in PCOS women. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Regional tissue sub-compartments, which have been shown to have potential independent associations with metabolic variables, cannot be determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The current results suggest that BIA could be used to assess F/L in place of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in research protocols, and that F/L could possibly be used as an alternative to WHR as a surrogate marker of metabolic dysfunction in clinical practice. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by grants R01-DK073632 and R01-HD29364 from the NIH and an endowment of the Helping Hand of Los Angeles, Inc. (to R.A.). The authors have no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/deu096

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. CarminaE,GuastellaE,LongoRA,RiniGB,LoboRA.Correlatesofincreased lean muscle mass in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol 2009; 1 :583-589.
  2. ChenYH,HeneidiS,LeeJM,LaymanLC,SteppDW,GamboaGM,ChenBS, ChazenbalkG,AzzizR.miRNA-93inhibitsGLUT4andisoverexpressedin adipose tissue of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome patients and women with insulin resistance. Diabetes 2013; 62 :2278-2286.
  3. DingEL,SongY,MalikVS,LiuS.Sexdifferencesofendogenoussexhormones and risk of type 2 diabetes:: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2006; 295 :1288-1299.
  4. LearSA,KohliS,BondyGP,TchernofA,SnidermanAD.Ethnicvariationinfat and lean body mass and the association with insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94 :4696-4702.
  5. NeelandIJ, Turer AT, Ayers CR, Powell-Wiley TM, Vega GL, Farzaneh-Far R, Grundy SM, Khera A, McGuire DK, de Lemos JA. Dysfunctional adiposity andtheriskof prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in obese adults. JAMA 2012; 308 :1150-1159.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ezeh, U., Pall, M., Mathur, R., & Azziz, R.
Affiliations
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Azziz, R.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2014-05-09
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
1508-1517
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2153074023
Cited by
71
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5
FWCI
7.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK073632)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD029364, R01-HD29364)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, body composition, metabolic dysfunction, insulin resistance, insulin secretion, beta-cell function, hyperandrogenism, insulin sensitivity, fat mass index, lean body mass, women's health, glucose uptake, waist-to-hip ratio, free testosterone, frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Body Composition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Homeostasis, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Prospective Studies, Absorptiometry, Photon, Body Mass Index, Case-Control Studies, Electric Impedance, Hyperandrogenism, Metabolic Syndrome, Waist-Hip Ratio, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review