Cited by 37Obesity and Health PracticesCancer Risks and FactorsGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

A systematic review of obesity as a barrier to accessing cancer screening services

Open access
Graham, Yitka, Hayes, Catherine, Cox, Julie, Mahawar, Kamal, Fox, Ann, Yemm, Heather·2022·Obesity Science & Practice

Abstract

Introduction: Obesity is a known risk factor for the development of cancers, and a significant proportion of the population may be at risk of developing cancer owing to their weight status. There is acknowledged societal stigma towards people living with obesity, which can influence health behaviors and deter help seeking, such as cancer screening. Healthcare professionals’ attitudes and views toward people living with obesity may adversely affect the patient–professional interface and treatment. Methods: A systematic review was carried out which aimed to explore the impact of living with obesity on the uptake of three main cancer‐screening services: breast, cervical, and colorectal. Results: Ten studies were included in the review. Three main areas were identified from both a patient and healthcare professional perspective: barriers and challenges to screening, gender issues, and disparities in the population living with obesity. Conclusion: Further research is needed to improve uptake of cancer screening services, and for education on weight bias, which is often unconscious, to be considered for healthcare professionals working in cancer screening services. This may help to increase the incidence of early differential diagnosis of potential cancers and improve health outcomes for people living with obesity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/osp4.606

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Obesity bias contributes to decreased use of preventive cancer screenings among patients with obesity, particularly in women.

    “Obesity bias contributes to decreased use of preventive cancer screenings among patients with obesity, particularly in women.7”

    From Obesity Management in Adults (2023) · cites this paper as [7]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [31]Cohen SS, Palmieri RT, Nyante SJ, et al. Obesity and screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer in women: a review. Cancer. 2008; 112(9): 1892‐ 1904. 18361400

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graham, Y., Hayes, C., Cox, J., Mahawar, K., Fox, A., & Yemm, H.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Anáhuac (MX)
  • University of Sunderland (GB)
  • South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Graham, Yitka
Venue
Obesity Science & Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-04-27
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
715-727
ISSN
2055-2238 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4223985081
Cited by
37
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Science & Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
obesity, cancer screening, screening uptake, barriers to health care access, weight stigma, weight bias, clinician attitudes, breast cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, colorectal cancer screening, gender differences, health disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review