Cited by 199Obesity and Health PracticesSocial and Intergroup PsychologyMental Health Treatment and Access

Weight bias in 2001 versus 2013: Contradictory attitudes among obesity researchers and health professionals

Open access
Tomiyama, A. Janet, Finch, Laura E., Belsky, Angela C. Incollingo, Buss, Julia, Finley, Carrie, Schwartz, Marlene B., Daubenmier, Jennifer·2015·Obesity

Abstract

Objectives: To assess levels of two types of anti‐fat bias in obesity specialists, explicit bias, or consciously accessible anti‐fat attitudes, and implicit bias, or attitudes that are activated outside of conscious awareness, were examined. This study also assessed changes over time by comparing levels of bias in 2013 to published data from 2001. Methods: In 232 attendees at the ObesityWeek 2013 conference, we measured explicit anti‐fat bias and conducted the Implicit Association Test. These data were compared to those from a study conducted at the 2001 meeting of this group. Results: Participants exhibited significant implicit and explicit anti‐fat/pro‐thin bias. Positivity of professional experience with obesity, but not type of professional experience, was correlated with lower explicit anti‐fat bias. Compared to 2001, the 2013 sample had lower levels of implicit bias and higher levels of explicit bias. Conclusions: Although implicit anti‐fat attitudes appeared to decrease from 2001 to 2013, explicit anti‐fat attitudes increased. Future research should examine whether increasing positive experiences with obese patients reduces anti‐fat bias among health professionals. Together, these results suggest that despite the current climate of widespread anti‐fat bias, there are pathways toward understanding and ameliorating this bias.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.20910

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]28. Arkes HR, Tetlock PE. Attributions of implicit prejudice, or 'Would Jesse Jackson 'Fail' the Implicit Association. Psychol Inq 2004;15:257-278.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tomiyama, A. J., Finch, L. E., Belsky, A. C. I., Buss, J., Finley, C., Schwartz, M. B., & Daubenmier, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Department of Psychology University of California Los Angeles California USA
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Cooper Institute (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Tomiyama, A. Janet
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10-08
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
46-53
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W1495352230
Cited by
199
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13
FWCI
29.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
weight bias, anti-fat bias, implicit bias, explicit bias, healthcare workers, Implicit Association Test, attitudes toward obesity
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude, Awareness, Body Weight, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Perception, Prejudice, Research Personnel, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review