Cited by 101Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsLabor market dynamics and wage inequalitySocial Policy and Reform Studies

Can work alter welfare recipients' beliefs?

Gottschalk, Peter·2005·Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Abstract

A common argument in support of work-based welfare reform is that exposure to work will lead welfare recipients to revise their beliefs about how they will be treated in the labor market. This paper explores the analytical and empirical basis for this argument. The difficulty in testing the assumption that work leads to a change in beliefs is that there is an inherent simultaneity between work and beliefs. Welfare recipients who work may have different beliefs because they learn about the world of work once they enter the labor market. Alternatively, welfare recipients who have a more positive view of work are the ones who are more likely to work. We use a unique data set that helps solve this simultaneity problem. We find that exogenous increases in work induced by an experimental tax credit led to the predicted change in beliefs among younger workers. © 2005 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pam.20111

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After 36 months, welfare recipients who received a subsidy for full-time work were more likely to have an improved locus of control.

    “After 36 months, those who received the subsidy were more likely to have an improved locus of control.”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Gottschalk [2005]

  • Working at a job can improve locus of control.

    “For example, Gottschalk [2005] shows evidence from a randomized control trial that working at a job can improve locus of control.”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Gottschalk [2005]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gottschalk, P.
Affiliations
Boston College (US)
Corresponding author
Gottschalk, Peter
Venue
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
485-498
ISSN
  • 0276-8739 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6688
OpenAlex
W1991803015
Cited by
101
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
10.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
Keywords
welfare recipients, labour market entry, simultaneity, self-selection, young workers, employee attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review