Cited by 75Barrier Structure and Function StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Response of cerebral microvasculature to brain injury

Maxwell, William L., Irvine, Alyson, Adams, J. Hume, Graham, David I., Gennarelli, Thomas A.·1988·The Journal of Pathology

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that there is a direct response of the cerebral microvasculature to head injury. We have investigated using SEM and TEM the response of microvessels within the white matter of the baboon brain to lateral head acceleration. There is rapid endothelial disruption and swelling of perivascular astrocytes near the sites of petechial haemorrhage. The formation of microvilli in all vessels reaches a peak at 6 h and extends at least 5 mm from the site of haemorrhage. The astrocyte response suggests a partial recovery by 6 h. The endothelial response is most marked in arterioles and venules and is maintained for 6 days after injury. We suggest there is a biphasic cerebrovascular response to brain injury. First there is rapid astrocytic swelling possibly correlated with transient disruption of the blood‐brain barrier. This is followed by morphological changes in the endothelium of all vessels which are most marked in arterioles and venules and extend considerable distances throughout the neuropile. This response is discussed in the light of disruption of the blood–brain barrier.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/path.1711550408

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ultrastructural studies in primates have revealed substantial cerebrovascular disruption after TBI, with widening of intercellular junctions between endothelial cells and swelling of perivascular astrocytes.

    “In fact, ultrastructural studies in primates have revealed substantial cerebrovascular disruption, with widening of intercellular junctions between endothelial cells and swelling of perivascular astrocytes (128).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maxwell, W. L., Irvine, A., Adams, J. H., Graham, D. I., & Gennarelli, T. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Southern General Hospital (GB)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Maxwell, William L.
Venue
The Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-08
Volume
155
Issue
4
Pages
327-335
ISSN
  • 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9896
OpenAlex
W1999292509
Cited by
75
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
cerebral microvasculature, traumatic brain injury, white matter, baboons, endothelial disruption, petechiae, microvilli, blood-brain barrier, arterioles, venules
MeSH terms
Animals, Arterioles, Brain, Brain Injuries, Capillaries, Endothelium, Vascular, Microcirculation, Microscopy, Electron, Microvilli, Papio, Venules

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review