Cited by 1,528Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

Diffuse axonal injury and traumatic coma in the primate

Gennarelli, Thomas A., Thibault, Lawrence E., Adams, J. Hume, Graham, David I., Thompson, Carson J., Marcincin, Robert P.·1982·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Traumatic coma was produced in 45 monkeys by accelerating the head without impact in one of three directions. The duration of coma, degree of neurological impairment, and amount of diffuse axonal injury (DAI) in the brain were directly related to the amount of coronal head motion used. Coma of less than 15 minutes (concussion) occurred in 11 of 13 animals subjected to sagittal head motion, in 2 of 6 animals with oblique head motion, and in 2 of 26 animals with full lateral head motion. All 15 concussioned animals had good recovery, and none had DAI. Conversely, coma lasting more than 6 hours occurred in one of the sagittal or oblique injury groups but was present in 20 of the laterally injured animals, all of which were severely disabled afterward. All laterally injured animals had a degree of DAI similar to that found in severe human head injury. Coma lasting 16 minutes to 6 hours occurred in 2 of 13 of the sagittal group, 4 of 6 in the oblique group, and 4 of 26 in the lateral group, these animals had less neurological disability and less DAI than when coma lasted longer than 6 hours. These experimental findings duplicate the spectrum of traumatic coma seen in human beings and include axonal damage identical to that seen in sever head injury in humans. Since the amount of DAI was directly proportional to the severity of injury (duration of coma and quality of outcome), we conclude that axonal damage produced by coronal head acceleration is a major cause of prolonged traumat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410120611

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have shown that the greatest brainstem damage with TBI is often near the dorsolateral surface of the mesopontine junction.

    “the observed pattern of injury is in keeping with other studies which have shown the greatest brainstem damage with TBI is often near the dorsolateral surface of the mesopontine junction, 12,13”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gennarelli, T. A., Thibault, L. E., Adams, J. H., Graham, D. I., Thompson, C. J., & Marcincin, R. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Gennarelli, Thomas A.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1982-12
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
564-574
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2065205627
Cited by
1,528
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 60
FWCI
10.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
diffuse axonal injury, traumatic coma, head acceleration, concussion, neurological outcome, monkey model, traumatic brain injury
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Animals, Axons, Brain, Brain Concussion, Brain Injuries, Coma, Disease Models, Animal, Macaca mulatta, Papio, Wounds, Nonpenetrating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review