Cited by 54Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentCancer Cells and MetastasisCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism

ALDH1A1-related stemness in high-grade serous ovarian cancer is a negative prognostic indicator but potentially targetable by EGFR/mTOR-PI3K/aurora kinase inhibitors

Open access
Kaipio, Katja, Chen, Ping, Roering, Pia, Huhtinen, Kaisa, Mikkonen, Piia, Östling, Päivi, Lehtinen, Laura, Mansuri, Naziha +8 more·2020·The Journal of Pathology

Abstract

Poor chemotherapy response remains a major treatment challenge for high‐grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC). Cancer stem cells are the major contributors to relapse and treatment failure as they can survive conventional therapy. Our objectives were to characterise stemness features in primary patient‐derived cell lines, correlate stemness markers with clinical outcome and test the response of our cells to both conventional and exploratory drugs. Tissue and ascites samples, treatment‐naive and/or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, were prospectively collected. Primary cancer cells, cultured under conditions favouring either adherent or spheroid growth, were tested for stemness markers; the same markers were analysed in tissue and correlated with chemotherapy response and survival. Drug sensitivity and resistance testing was performed with 306 oncology compounds. Spheroid growth condition HGSC cells showed increased stemness marker expression (including aldehyde dehydrogenase isoform I; ALDH1A1) as compared with adherent growth condition cells, and increased resistance to platinum and taxane. A set of eight stemness markers separated treatment‐naive tumours into two clusters and identified a distinct subgroup of HGSC with enriched stemness features. Expression of ALDH1A1, but not most other stemness markers, was increased after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its expression in treatment‐naive tumours correlated with chemoresistance and reduced survival. In drug sensitivity and resistance testing, five compounds, including two PI3K‐mTOR inhibitors, demonstrated significant activity in both cell culture conditions. Thirteen compounds, including EGFR, PI3K‐mTOR and aurora kinase inhibitors, were more toxic to spheroid cells than adherent cells. Our results identify stemness markers in HGSC that are associated with a decreased response to conventional chemotherapy and reduced survival if expressed by treatment‐naive tumours. EGFR, mTOR‐PI3K and aurora kinase inhibitors are candidates for targeting this cell population. © 2019 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/path.5356

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CIP2A is linked to stemness traits in patient-derived high-grade serous cancer cells.

    “CIP2A was recently also shown in cell culture to protect OvCa cells from Cisplatin-induced apoptosis (10), and to associate with stemness features in patient-derived high grade serous cancer (HGSC) cells (11).”
  • APR-246 plus NF-kB inhibition was also effective in patient-derived ovarian cancer cell line OC002.

    “Finally, the combined action of APR-246 and NF-kB inhibition was validated in patient-derived OvCa cell line OC002 derived from a patient with disseminated disease (Fig. 4I)(11).”

    From Ovarian Cancers with Low CIP2A Tumor Expression Constitute an APR-246–Sensitive Disease Subtype (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

    The drug-sensitivity testing section reports results for patient-derived lines M019i, M068i, and M022i, but does not report an APR-246/NF-κB inhibitor combination in OC002. Searches for APR-246, OC002, and NF-κB inhibition found no passage describing the claimed validation; the NF-κB mention is in a reference to a different study (References; page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CIP2A associates with stemness features in patient-derived high grade serous cancer cells.

    “and to associate with stemness features in patient-derived high grade serous cancer (HGSC) cells (11).”
  • The combined action of APR-246 and NF-kB inhibition was validated in patient-derived OvCa cell line OC002 derived from a patient with disseminated disease.

    “Finally, the combined action of APR-246 and NF-kB inhibition was validated in patient-derived OvCa cell line OC002 derived from a patient with disseminated disease (Fig.4I)(11).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaipio, K., Chen, P., Roering, P., Huhtinen, K., Mikkonen, P., Östling, P., Lehtinen, L., Mansuri, N., Korpela, T., Potdar, S., Hynninen, J., Auranen, A., Grénman, S., Wennerberg, K., Hautaniemi, S., & Carpén, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Tampere University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Kaipio, Katja
Venue
The Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-12-03
Volume
250
Issue
2
Pages
159-169
ISSN
  • 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9896
OpenAlex
W2979766702
Cited by
54
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Academy of Finland (292606)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Keywords
high-grade serous ovarian cancer, cancer stem cells, ALDH1A1, stem cell markers, chemoresistance, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, spheroid growth, drug sensitivity, drug resistance, PI3K/mTOR inhibitors, EGFR inhibitors, Aurora kinase inhibitors, prognostic factors, survival
MeSH terms
Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 Family, Antineoplastic Agents, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, Female, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prognosis, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Biomarkers, Tumor, Neoplastic Stem Cells, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Spheroids, Cellular, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Retinal Dehydrogenase, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Neoplasm Grading, Aurora Kinases, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review