Cited by 15Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisHistorical and Scientific StudiesAnalytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals

Nachweis von Arznei-und anderen Fremdstoffen in Haaren

Schütz, Harald, Ahrens, Björn, Erdmann, Freidoon, Rochholz, Gertrud·1993·Pharmazie in unserer Zeit

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pauz.19930220205

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schütz, H., Ahrens, B., Erdmann, F., & Rochholz, G.
Venue
Pharmazie in unserer Zeit
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-01
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
65-78
ISSN
  • 0048-3664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-1003
OpenAlex
W2135384187
Cited by
15
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmazie in unserer Zeit (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Historical and Scientific Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Keywords
drug detection in hair, hair analysis, forensic toxicology, drug testing
MeSH terms
Pharmaceutical Preparations, Hair, Humans, Xenobiotics, Substance Abuse Detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review