Cited by 36Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeSurvey Methodology and NonresponseChildren's Rights and Participation

Adolescent and Young Adult Patient Engagement and Participation in Survey‐Based Research: A Report From the “Resilience in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer” Study

Open access
Rosenberg, Abby R., Bona, Kira, Wharton, Claire M., Bradford, Miranda, Shaffer, Michele L., Wolfe, Joanne, Baker, Kevin Scott·2016·Pediatric Blood & Cancer

Abstract

Conducting patient‐reported outcomes research with adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is difficult due to low participation rates and high attrition. Forty‐seven AYAs with newly diagnosed cancer at two large hospitals were prospectively surveyed at the time of diagnosis and 3–6 and 12–18 months later. A subset participated in 1:1 semistructured interviews. Attrition prompted early study closure at one site. The majority of patients preferred paper–pencil to online surveys. Interview participants were more likely to complete surveys (e.g., 93% vs. 58% completion of 3–6 month surveys, P = 0.02). Engaging patients through qualitative methodologies and using patient‐preferred instruments may optimize future research success.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pbc.25843

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenberg, A. R., Bona, K., Wharton, C. M., Bradford, M., Shaffer, M. L., Wolfe, J., & Baker, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Seattle Children's Research Institute (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Rosenberg, Abby R.
Venue
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-18
Volume
63
Issue
4
Pages
734-736
ISSN
  • 1545-5009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-5017
OpenAlex
W2214055178
Cited by
36
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Blood & Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR000421, KL2TR002317)
  • National Cancer Institute (L40 CA170049)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
Keywords
adolescents and young adults, cancer, patient engagement, patient-reported outcomes, survey attrition, survey completion, patient preferences, resilience, newly diagnosed cancer, research participation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Health Services Research, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Patient Participation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review