Cited by 39Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeSurvey Methodology and NonresponseCancer survivorship and care

Recruiting Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors for Patient-Reported Outcome Research: Experiences and Sample Characteristics of the SURVAYA Study

Open access
Vlooswijk, Carla, Poll-Franse, Lonneke V. van de, Janssen, Silvie H. M., Derksen, Esther, Reuvers, Milou J. P., Bijlsma, Rhodé, Kaal, Suzanne E. J., Kerst, Jan Martijn +8 more·2022·Current Oncology

Abstract

Background: Participation of Adolescents and Young Adults with cancer (AYAs: 18–39 years at time of diagnosis) in patient-reported outcome studies is warranted given the limited knowledge of (long-term) physical and psychosocial health outcomes. We examined the representativeness of AYAs participating in the study, to observe the impact of various invitation methods on response rates and reasons for non-participation. Methods: A population-based, cross-sectional cohort study was performed among long-term (5–20 years) AYA cancer survivors. All participants were invited using various methods to fill in a questionnaire on their health outcomes, including enclosing a paper version of the questionnaire, and sending a reminder. Those who did not respond received a postcard in which they were asked to provide a reason for non-participation. Results: In total, 4.010 AYAs (response 36%) participated. Females, AYAs with a higher socio-economic status (SES), diagnosed more than 10 years ago, diagnosed with a central nervous system tumor, sarcoma, a lymphoid malignancy, stage III, or treated with systemic chemotherapy were more likely to participate. Including a paper questionnaire increased the response rate by 5% and sending a reminder by 13%. AYAs who did not participate were either not interested (47%) or did want to be reminded of their cancer (31%). Conclusions: Study participation was significantly lower among specific subgroups of AYA cancer survivors. Higher response rates were achieved when a paper questionnaire was included, and reminders were sent. To increase representativeness of future AYA study samples, recruitment strategies could focus on integrating patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice and involving AYA patients to promote participation in research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/curroncol29080428

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [9]Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Progress Review Group Closing the Gap: Research and Care Imperatives for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer, 2006 Available online: https://www.livestrong.org/content/closing-gap-research-and-careimperatives-adolescents-and-young-adults-cancer (accessed on 12 July 2022)
  2. [29]Sobin L. Gospodarowicz M.K. Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours Wiley New York, NY, USA 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vlooswijk, C., Poll-Franse, L. V. V. D., Janssen, S. H. M., Derksen, E., Reuvers, M. J. P., Bijlsma, R., Kaal, S. E. J., Kerst, J. M., Tromp, J. M., Bos, M. E. M. M., Hulle, T. V. D., Lalisang, R. I., Nuver, J., Kouwenhoven, M. C. M., van der Graaf, W. T. A., & Husson, O.
Affiliations
  • Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (NL)
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Husson, Olga
Venue
Current Oncology
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-07-29
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
5407-5425
ISSN
  • 1198-0052 (ISSN-L)
  • 1718-7729
OpenAlex
W4289110780
Cited by
39
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Dutch Cancer Society (11788, 198.007, 1480-08-009)
  • Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (11788, 198.007, 1480-08-009)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
adolescent and young adult cancer survivors, patient-reported outcomes, research recruitment, response rate, non-participation, sample representativeness, questionnaire format, long-term oncological outcomes, psychosocial outcomes
MeSH terms
Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Cancer Survivors, Adolescent, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review