Cited by 14Antibiotic Use and ResistanceHealthcare cost, quality, practicesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Antibiotic prescribing by telephone in primary care

Ewen, Edward, Willey, Vincent J., Kolm, Paul, McGhan, William F., Drees, Marci·2015·Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

Abstract

Objectives: Little is known about the contribution of telephone‐based prescribing on overall antibiotic utilization. The objective of this study was to determine the extent and characteristics of telephone‐based antibiotic prescribing in teaching and non‐teaching primary care practices. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients (n = 114 610) cared for by teaching and non‐teaching internal medicine, pediatrics, family practice, and obstetrics/gynecology practices (n = 19) affiliated with a large US healthcare system during 2006–2010 and using a common electronic medical record. Rates and types of antibiotics prescribed by teaching and non‐teaching practices via telephone contact and office visit were compared among the overall cohort. All telephone‐related prescriptions during 2008 underwent chart review to determine indications for antibiotic prescribing. Results: Overall, 28.9 antibiotic prescriptions were issued per 100 patient‐years, with 63 418 total antibiotic prescriptions and 7876 (12.4%) generated after telephone contact. Telephone‐based prescribing increased steadily from 2.2 to 4.2 per 100 patient‐years during the study period. Both telephone‐based and office‐based antibiotic prescribing were higher in non‐teaching practices. Of 1790 antibiotics prescribed by telephone during 2008, the majority were for urinary tract infection (28.3%), sinusitis (20.1%), and unspecified upper respiratory infection (URI, 15.0%). Conclusions: Overall, one in every eight antibiotics was prescribed via telephone encounter. These data highlight the need to include the impact of this practice in analysis of outcomes associated with outpatient antibiotic prescribing and to incorporate telephonic prescribing into guidelines facilitating appropriate antibiotic use. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pds.3686

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ewen, E., Willey, V. J., Kolm, P., McGhan, W. F., & Drees, M.
Affiliations
  • Christiana Care Health System (US)
  • Carelon Research (United States) (US)
  • University of the Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Ewen, Edward
Venue
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-31
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
113-120
ISSN
  • 1053-8569 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1557
OpenAlex
W1555593428
Cited by
14
References
52
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
antibiotic prescribing, primary care, antibiotic use, urinary tract infection, sinusitis, upper respiratory tract infection, appropriateness of antibiotic use, outpatient prescribing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Drug Utilization, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Primary Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Telephone, Prescriptions, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review