Cited by 148Resilience and Mental HealthStudent Stress and CopingPersonality Traits and Psychology

Situational and dispositional coping: an examination of their relation to personality, cognitive appraisals, and psychological distress.

Bouchard, Geneviève, Guillemette, Annie, Landry‐Léger, Nicole·2004·European Journal of Personality

Abstract

Reliable data on the relationships between situational and dispositional coping strategies are sparse. In order to address this gap in the literature, this study examined the determinants and adaptational outcomes of both types of coping. Two hundred and thirty‐three students completed, along with measures of situational and dispositional coping, measures of personality, cognitive appraisals, and psychological distress, the latter variable being evaluated concurrently and prospectively (10 weeks). Results showed that personality shared as much variance with situational as with dispositional coping, but the patterns of relationships were rather different. In addition, cognitive appraisals were found to add significant incremental validity in predicting situational coping beyond trait coping, but primary appraisals were redundant with personality traits, in particular neuroticism. Finally, in spite of the significant amount of variance shared between the two types of coping, they both accounted for individual differences in concomitant and prospective psychological distress, and the relation between dispositional coping and distress was partially mediated by situational coping. The implications of these findings for understanding the relationships between the two types of coping strategy are discussed. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/per.512

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouchard, G., Guillemette, A., & Landry‐Léger, N.
Affiliations
Université de Moncton (CA)
Venue
European Journal of Personality
Published
2004-04
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
221-238
ISSN
  • 0890-2070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0984
OpenAlex
W1977238510
Cited by
148
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (419‐2000‐0081)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
dispositional coping, personality traits, cognitive appraisal, primary appraisal, neuroticism, psychological distress, coping strategies, mediation, students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review