Cited by 21Personality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Retrospective reports of attachment disruptions, parental abuse and neglect mediate the relationship between pathological narcissism and self-esteem

Maxwell, Kendal, Huprich, Steven·2014·Personality and Mental Health

Abstract

Studies have shown a direct relationship between pathological narcissism and self-esteem; however, there have not been many studies that have empirically tested which theoretically relevant variables mediate this relationship. In the present study, we evaluated how self-reported, early negative childhood experiences with parental figures mediate the relationship between pathological narcissism and self-esteem. Four-hundred eight-five undergraduates from a Midwestern university retrospectively assessed their experiences of parental attachment and bonding, as well as their levels of pathological narcissism and current self-esteem. There was a significant correlation among all pathological narcissism subscales and self-esteem, except for the Exploitativeness subscale. Self-esteem was negatively correlated with all negative childhood experiences on the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) and was positively correlated with positive childhood experiences on the Parental Attachment Questionnaire (PAQ). The parental relationship quality was negatively associated with all but one Pathological Narcissism Inventory subscale, as was the PAQ total score. Lastly, emotional neglect on the CTQ significantly mediated the relationship between several pathological narcissism subscales and self-esteem. When investigating parental attachment and parental bonding, the quality of the relationship with the parent was a significant mediator between pathological narcissism and self-esteem. These findings demonstrate the importance of understanding the adverse effects of parental abuse and neglect on healthy development of the self and self-esteem. Clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmh.1269

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maxwell, K., & Huprich, S.
Affiliations
  • University of North Texas (US)
  • Wichita State University (US)
Corresponding author
Maxwell, Kendal
Venue
Personality and Mental Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
290-305
ISSN
1932-8621 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129959132
Cited by
21
References
54
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Holmes Museum Of Anthropology (Wichita State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Midwestern University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
pathological narcissism, self-esteem, parental attachment, parental bonding, childhood abuse, child neglect, emotional neglect, childhood trauma, parental relationship quality, mediation, attachment disruption
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Object Attachment, Personality Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Self Concept, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review