Cited by 350Personality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup PsychologyEmotions and Moral Behavior

Discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-esteem: Implications for narcissism and self-esteem instability

Zeigler‐Hill, Virgil·2006·Journal of Personality

Abstract

There appear to be two forms of high self-esteem: secure high self-esteem (which is often linked with psychological health) and fragile high self-esteem (which is generally associated with poor psychological adjustment and impaired interpersonal relationships). Discrepant high self-esteem is a form of fragile self-esteem characterized by high explicit self-esteem and low implicit self-esteem. The present study examined whether discrepant high self-esteem was associated with narcissism and self-esteem instability in an undergraduate sample. Using multiple measures of implicit self-esteem, two basic findings emerged from the present study. First, participants with discrepant high self-esteem possessed the highest levels of narcissism. Second, participants with high explicit self-esteem and high implicit self-esteem displayed the most stable self-esteem. Findings are discussed in terms of secure and fragile high self-esteem.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00371.x

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Narcissistic individuals exhibit high explicit but fragile implicit self-esteem, contributing to self-esteem instability and driving reliance on maladaptive self-enhancement strategies.

    “Empirical evidence supports this conceptualization, demonstrating that narcissistic individuals exhibit high explicit but fragile implicit self-esteem, contributing to self-esteem instability and driving reliance on maladaptive self-enhancement strategies (57).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeigler‐Hill, V.
Affiliations
University of Southern Mississippi (US)
Corresponding author
Zeigler‐Hill, Virgil
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11-15
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
119-144
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W2164737502
Cited by
350
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 22
FWCI
12.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
implicit self-esteem, explicit self-esteem, narcissism, self-esteem instability, psychological adjustment, interpersonal relationships
MeSH terms
Adult, Defense Mechanisms, Emotions, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Narcissism, Personality Inventory, Self Concept, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review