The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of protein‐protein interactions using in vivo cross‐linking and mass spectrometry
Abstract
The purification of protein complexes can be accomplished by different types of affinity chromatography. In a typical immunoaffinity experiment, protein complexes are captured from a cell lysate by an immobilized antibody that recognizes an epitope on one of the known components of the complex. After extensive washing to remove unspecifically bound proteins, the complexes are eluted and analyzed by mass spectrometry (MS). Transient complexes, which are characterized by high dissociation constants, are typically lost by this approach. In the present study, we describe a novel method for identifying transient protein‐protein interactions using in vivo cross‐linking and MS‐based protein identification. Live cells are treated with formaldehyde, which rapidly permeates the cell membrane and generates protein‐protein cross‐links. Proteins cross‐linked to a Myc‐tagged protein of interest are copurified by immunoaffinity chromatography and subjected to a procedure which dissociates the cross‐linked complexes. After separation by SDS‐PAGE, proteins are identified by tandem mass spectrometry. Application of this method enabled the identification of numerous proteins that copurified with a constitutively active form of M‐Ras (M‐Ras Q71L). Among these, we identified the RasGAP‐related protein IQGAP1 to be a novel interaction partner of M‐Ras Q71L. This method is applicable to many proteins and will aid in the study of protein‐protein interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identification of Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors (GEFs) for the Rap1 GTPase
Rebhun, J. F., Castro, A. F., & Quilliam, L. A. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m005327200 · Cited by 164
Gao, X., Satoh, T., Liao, Y., Song, C., Hu, C.-D., Kariya, K.-I., & Kataoka, T. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m105760200 · Cited by 106
Cited by
Analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry
Gingras, A.-C., Gstaiger, M., Raught, B., & Aebersold, R. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2208 · Cited by 708
Miro1 Is a Calcium Sensor for Glutamate Receptor-Dependent Localization of Mitochondria at Synapses
MacAskill, A. F., Rinholm, J. E., Twelvetrees, A. E., Arancibia-Carcamo, I. L., Muir, J., Fransson, A., Aspenstrom, P., Attwell, D., & Kittler, J. T. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.030 · Cited by 674
Sinz, A. (2006) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20082 · Cited by 648
Formaldehyde Crosslinking: A Tool for the Study of Chromatin Complexes
Hoffman, E. A., Frey, B. L., Smith, L. M., & Auble, D. T. (2015) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r115.651679 · Cited by 441
Protein Complexes in the Gas Phase: Technology for Structural Genomics and Proteomics
Benesch, J. L. P., Ruotolo, B. T., Simmons, D. A., & Robinson, C. V. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068289b · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Vasilescu, J., Guo, X., & Kast, J.
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3845-3854
- ISSN
- 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2069790213
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of protein‐protein interactions using in vivo cross‐linking and mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200400856
- The paper
- Vasilescu, J., Guo, X., & Kast, J. (2004). Identification of protein‐protein interactions using in vivo cross‐linking and mass spectrometry. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200400856
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.