Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative LC‐MS: A landscape of peaks and valleys

Open access
America, Antoine H. P., Cordewener, Jan H. G.·2008·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

Quantitative proteomics approaches using stable isotopes are well‐known and used in many labs nowadays. More recently, high resolution quantitative approaches are reported that rely on LC‐MS quantitation of peptide concentrations by comparing peak intensities between multiple runs obtained by continuous detection in MS mode. Characteristic of these comparative LC‐MS procedures is that they do not rely on the use of stable isotopes; therefore the procedure is often referred to as label‐free LC‐MS. In order to compare at comprehensive scale peak intensity data in multiple LC‐MS datasets, dedicated software is required for detection, matching and alignment of peaks. The high accuracy in quantitative determination of peptide abundancies provides an impressive level of detail. This approach also requires an experimental set‐up where quantitative aspects of protein extraction and reproducible separation conditions need to be well controlled. In this paper we will provide insight in the critical parameters that affect the quality of the results and list an overview of the most recent software packages that are available for this procedure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.200700694

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
America, A. H. P., & Cordewener, J. H. G.
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
731-749
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W1991777486
Cited by
191
References
10
FWCI
13.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative LC‐MS: A landscape of peaks and valleys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200700694
The paper
America, A. H. P., & Cordewener, J. H. G. (2008). Comparative LC‐MS: A landscape of peaks and valleys. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200700694

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.