The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Déjà vu in proteomics. A hit parade of repeatedly identified differentially expressed proteins
Open accessAbstract
After reading many 2‐DE‐based articles featuring lists of the differentially expressed proteins, one starts experiencing a disturbing déjà vu. The same proteins seem to predominate regardless of the experiment, tissue or species. To quantify the occurrence of individual differentially expressed proteins in 2‐DE experiment reports, we compiled the identities of differentially expressed proteins identified in human, mouse, and rat tissues published in three recent volumes of Proteomics and calculated the appearance of the most predominant proteins in the dataset. The most frequently identified protein is a highly abundant glycolytic enzyme enolase 1, differentially expressed in nearly every third experiment on both human and rodent tissues. Heat‐shock protein 27 (HSP27) and heat‐shock protein 60 (HSP60) were differentially expressed in about 30 percent of human and rodent samples, respectively. Considering protein families as units, keratins and peroxiredoxins are the most frequently identified molecules, with at least one member of the group being differentially expressed in about 40 percent of all experiments. We suggest that the frequent identification of these proteins must be considered in the interpretation of any 2‐DE studies. We consider if these commonly observed changes represent common cellular stress responses or are a reflection of the technical limitations of 2‐DE.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
limma: Linear Models for Microarray Data
Smyth, G. K. (2005) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/0-387-29362-0_23 · Cited by 5,796
Essential role for the peroxiredoxin Prdx1 in erythrocyte antioxidant defence and tumour suppression
Neumann, C. A., Krause, D. S., Carman, C. V., Das, S., Dubey, D. P., Abraham, J. L., Bronson, R. T., Fujiwara, Y., Orkin, S. H., & Van Etten, R. A. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01819 · Cited by 801
Cited by
Sultana, R., Perluigi, M., & Butterfield, D. A. (2013) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.09.027 · Cited by 478
Precision proteomics: The case for high resolution and high mass accuracy
Mann, M., & Kelleher, N. L. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0800788105 · Cited by 450
Intermediate filaments take the heat as stress proteins
Toivola, D. M., Strnad, P., Habtezion, A., & Omary, M. B. (2010) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2009.11.004 · Cited by 280
Pan, T.-L., Wang, P.-W., Aljuffali, I. A., Huang, C.-T., Lee, C.-W., & Fang, J.-Y. (2015) · Journal of Dermatological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2015.01.011 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Petrak, J., Ivanek, R., Toman, O., Cmejla, R., Cmejlova, J., Vyoral, D., Zivny, J., & Vulpe, C. D.
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-04-29
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1744-1749
- ISSN
- 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9861
- OpenAlex
- W1968494166
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Déjà vu in proteomics. A hit parade of repeatedly identified differentially expressed proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200700919
- The paper
- Petrak, J., Ivanek, R., Toman, O., Cmejla, R., Cmejlova, J., Vyoral, D., Zivny, J., & Vulpe, C. D. (2008). Déjà vu in proteomics. A hit parade of repeatedly identified differentially expressed proteins. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200700919
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.