The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recent advances in the use of Sus scrofa (pig) as a model system for proteomic studies
Abstract
Of the numerous animal models available for proteomic studies only a small number have been successfully used in understanding human biology. To date, rodents have been widely employed in proteomic and genomic studies but often these models do not truly mimic the relevant human conditions. On the other hand, the pig shows similarity in size, shape and physiology to human and has been used as a major mammalian model for many studies concerning xenotransplantation, cardiovascular diseases, blood dynamics, nutrition, general metabolic functions, digestive‐related disorders, respiratory diseases, diabetes, kidney and bladder diseases, organ‐specific toxicity, dermatology and neurological sequelae. With the substantially improved knowledge of the structure and function of the pig genome in the last two decades it has been found that this animal shares a high sequence and chromosomal structure homology with humans. Nevertheless, in comparison to other available model organisms, very little work has been devoted to pig proteomics until recently. Keeping this in mind, the present review will highlight some of the advantages and disadvantages of pig as a model system for proteomic studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The porcine innate immune system: an update
Mair, K. H., Sedlak, C., Käser, T., Pasternak, A., Levast, B., Gerner, W., Saalmüller, A., Summerfield, A., Gerdts, V., Wilson, H. L., et al. (2014) · Developmental & Comparative Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.dci.2014.03.022 · Cited by 264
Porcine Models of Cutaneous Wound Healing
Seaton, M., Hocking, A., & Gibran, N. S. (2015) · ILAR Journal · doi:10.1093/ilar/ilv016 · Cited by 249
The pig as an animal model for human pathologies: A proteomics perspective
Bassols, A., Costa, C., Eckersall, P. D., Osada, J., Sabrià, J., & Tibau, J. (2014) · PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications · doi:10.1002/prca.201300099 · Cited by 254
Matin, M., Koszarska, M., Atanasov, A. G., Król-Szmajda, K., Jóźwik, A., Stelmasiak, A., & Hejna, M. (2024) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules29194695 · Cited by 104
Current approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of white sponge nevus
Cai, W., Jiang, B., Yu, F., Yang, J., Chen, Z., Liu, J., Wei, R., Zhao, S., Wang, X., & Liu, S. (2015) · Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1017/erm.2015.7 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Verma, N., Rettenmeier, A. W., & Schmitz‐Spanke, S.
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-13
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 776-793
- ISSN
- 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2083509286
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent advances in the use of Sus scrofa (pig) as a model system for proteomic studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.201000320
- The paper
- Verma, N., Rettenmeier, A. W., & Schmitz‐Spanke, S. (2011). Recent advances in the use of Sus scrofa (pig) as a model system for proteomic studies. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201000320
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.