The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Forecasting Success on Large Projects: Developing Reliable Scales to Predict Multiple Perspectives by Multiple Stakeholders over Multiple Time Frames
Abstract
Our aim is to develop a set of leading performance indicators to enable managers of large projects to forecast during project execution how various stakeholders will perceive success months or even years into the operation of the output. Large projects have many stakeholders who have different objectives for the project, its output, and the business objectives they will deliver. The output of a large project may have a lifetime that lasts for years, or even decades, and ultimate impacts that go beyond its immediate operation. How different stakeholders perceive success can change with time, and so the project manager needs leading performance indicators that go beyond the traditional triple constraint to forecast how key stakeholders will perceive success months or even years later. In this article, we develop a model for project success that identifies how project stakeholders might perceive success in the months and years following a project. We identify success or failure factors that will facilitate or mitigate against achievement of those success criteria, and a set of potential leading performance indicators that forecast how stakeholders will perceive success during the life of the project's output. We conducted a scale development study with 152 managers of large projects and identified two project success factor scales and seven stakeholder satisfaction scales that can be used by project managers to predict stakeholder satisfaction on projects and so may be used by the managers of large projects for the basis of project control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atkinson, R. (1999) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(98)00069-6 · Cited by 2,359
The Anatomy of Major Projects: A Study of the Reality of Project Management
Morris, P. W. G., & Hough, G. H. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 678
Reinventing Project Management: The Diamond Approach to Successful Growth and Innovation
Markham, S. K. (2007) · Research-Technology Management · Cited by 658
The Project Excellence Model®: linking success criteria and critical success factors
Westerveld, E. (2003) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(02)00112-6 · Cited by 650
Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type
Müller, R., & Turner, J. R. (2007) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.04.003 · Cited by 638
Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2
Axelos (2017) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 451
Success Criteria and Factors for International Development Projects: A Life-Cycle-Based Framework
Khang, D. B., & Moe, T. L. (2008) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1002/pmj.20034 · Cited by 394
Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization:
Turner, J. R., & Keegan, A. E. (2001) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/s0263-2373(01)00022-6 · Cited by 293
Success factors: public works and public‐private partnerships
Jacobson, C., & Choi, S. O. (2008) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/09513550810896514 · Cited by 276
Lock, D. (1987) · Cited by 258
Cited by
Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success
Davis, K. (2014) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.02.006 · Cited by 532
Project governance and stakeholders: a literature review
Derakhshan, R., Turner, R., & Mancini, M. (2019) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.10.007 · Cited by 300
Self-citationThe Relationship between Project Success and Project Efficiency
Serrador, P., & Turner, R. (2015) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1002/pmj.21468 · Cited by 296
Self-citationThe front-end of projects: a systematic literature review and structuring
Williams, T., Vo, H., Samset, K., & Edkins, A. (2019) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1594429 · Cited by 145
Mapping wastes in complex projects for Lean Product Development
Belvedere, V., Cuttaia, F., Rossi, M., & Stringhetti, L. (2019) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.008 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner, R., & Zolin, R.
- Venue
- Project Management Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 87-99
- ISSN
- 1938-9507 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-9728
- OpenAlex
- W2034377441
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 17.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Forecasting Success on Large Projects: Developing Reliable Scales to Predict Multiple Perspectives by Multiple Stakeholders over Multiple Time Frames. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmj.21289
- The paper
- Turner, R., & Zolin, R. (2012). Forecasting Success on Large Projects: Developing Reliable Scales to Predict Multiple Perspectives by Multiple Stakeholders over Multiple Time Frames. Project Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.