Cited by 26Polymer crystallization and propertiesCrystallization and Solubility Studiesnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions

Effect of a sorbitol nucleating agent on fractionated crystallization of polypropylene droplets

Jin, Y., Hiltner, A., Baer, E.·2007·Journal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics

Abstract

Abstract The effect of a sorbitol nucleating agent on crystallization of polypropylene (PP) in droplets was studied. Layer‐multiplying coextrusion was used to fabricate assemblies of 257 layers, in which PP nanolayers alternated with thicker polystyrene (PS) layers. The concentration of a commercial nucleating agent, Millad 3988 (MD) in the layers was varied up to 2 wt %. When the assembly was heated into the melt, interfacial driven breakup of the 12 nm PP layers produced a dispersion of submicron PP particles in a PS matrix. Analysis of optical microscope images and atomic force microscope images indicated that the particle size was not affected by the presence of MD. The crystallization behavior of the particle dispersion was characterized by thermal analysis. In the absence of a nucleating agent, the submicron particles crystallized almost exclusively by homogeneous nucleation at about 40 °C. Addition of a nucleating agent to the PP layers offered a unique opportunity to study the nature of heterogeneous nucleation. Nucleation by MD resulted in fractionated crystallization of the submicron PP particles. The concentration dependence of the multiple crystallization exotherms was interpreted in terms of the binary polypropylene‐sorbitol phase diagram. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 45: 1788–1797, 2007

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/polb.21195

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The origin of fractionated crystallization is the lack of efficient nuclei.

    “The origin of fractionated crystallization is ascribed to the lack of efficient nuclei, and this hypothesis can also be verified by the addition of nucleating agents.[ 8 , 13 , 32 , 46 , 4 8 , 4 9 ]”

    From Fractionated crystallization in semicrystalline polymers (2021) · cites this paper as [46]

  • With increasing DMBS concentration from 0 to 0.5%, the enthalpy of the homogeneous nucleation exotherm centered at 40 °C decreased, while the enthalpy of the 60 °C peak increased due to the presence of nucleant in the iPP droplets.

    “It can be seen that with increasing the concentration of DMBS from 0 to 0.5 %, the enthalpy of homogeneous nucleation exotherm centered at 40 °C decreased, while on the opposite the enthalpy of 60 °C peak increased due to the presence of the nucleant in the iPP droplets.”

    From Fractionated crystallization in semicrystalline polymers (2021) · cites this paper as [46]

  • In iPP nanolayers after thermal breakup and droplet formation, crystallization of iPP shifted to much larger undercoolings at around 40 °C (homogeneous nucleation) and 60 °C.

    “In iPP nanolayers, after the thermal breakup and formation of droplets, the crystallization of iPP shifted to much larger undercoolings at around 40 °C (homogeneous nucleation) and 60 °C, as shown in Fig. 34 A (see also section 2.2 ).”

    From Fractionated crystallization in semicrystalline polymers (2021) · cites this paper as [46]

  • Addition of nucleating agents can verify the hypothesis that fractionated crystallization originates from a lack of efficient nuclei.

    “The origin of fractionated crystallization is ascribed to the lack of efficient nuclei, and this hypothesis can also be verified by the addition of nucleating agents.[ 8 , 13 , 32 , 46 , 4 8 , 4 9 ]”

    From Fractionated crystallization in semicrystalline polymers (2021) · cites this paper as [46]

  • The selected non-isothermal crystallization temperatures of iPP in isolated polymer domains are ascribed to the homogeneous nucleation mechanism.

    “The selected temperatures are ascribed to the homogeneous nucleation mechanism.”

    From Fractionated crystallization in semicrystalline polymers (2021) · cites this paper as [46]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jin, Y., Hiltner, A., & Baer, E.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Hiltner, A.
Venue
Journal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06-05
Volume
45
Issue
14
Pages
1788-1797
ISSN
  • 0887-6266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0488
OpenAlex
W2138487261
Cited by
26
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Keywords
polypropylene, fractional crystallization, heterogeneous nucleation, homogeneous nucleation, submicron particles, polystyrene matrix, particle size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review