Cited by 35Conducting polymers and applicationsPolymer Surface Interaction StudiesForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications

Stiffness quantification of conductive polymers for bioelectrodes

Hassarati, Rachelle T., Goding, Josef A., Baek, Sungchul, Patton, Alexander J., Poole‐Warren, Laura A., Green, Rylie A.·2014·Journal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics

Abstract

ABSTRACT Conductive polymer (CP) coatings can improve the performance of metallic bioelectrodes in implantable devices, a benefit which is partially attributed to the “softer” material interface. However, due to the nature of CP fabrication on metallic substrates, accurate quantification of mechanical properties has been difficult to achieve. This study demonstrates that peak‐force quantitative nanomechanical mapping (PF‐QNM) is a robust technique for determining the modulus of CP coatings. The effect of dopant size, chemistry, and film hydration on the mechanical properties of poly(3,4‐ethylene dioxythiophene) (PEDOT) is also examined. Analysis of PEDOT doped with poly(styrene sulfonate) produced across five different thicknesses confirms the utility of PF‐QNM in yielding quantitative, repeatable moduli in both the dry and hydrated state. By doping PEDOT with paratoluene sulfonate and perchlorate (ClO4) it is shown that the hydrophilicity and the size of the dopant are both critical factors influencing CP mechanical properties in the hydrated environment. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys.2014,52, 666–675

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/polb.23465

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conductive polymers are considerably softer than metals, flexible and conformable, and have a high charge injection capacity.

    “Conductive polymers have been widely used in implantable devices for research as they are considerably softer than metals, flexible and conformable, and have a high charge injection capacity [166][167][168][169][170].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hassarati, R. T., Goding, J. A., Baek, S., Patton, A. J., Poole‐Warren, L. A., & Green, R. A.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering University of New South Wales Sydney 2052 New South Wales Australia
Corresponding author
Green, Rylie A.
Venue
Journal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-26
Volume
52
Issue
9
Pages
666-675
ISSN
  • 0887-6266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0488
OpenAlex
W2159688165
Cited by
35
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Conducting polymers and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
conducting polymers, bioelectrodes, PEDOT, polystyrene sulfonate, perchlorate doping, elastic modulus, film hydration, hydrophilicity, biomedical implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review