Cited by 77Health, psychology, and well-beingCancer survivorship and careOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Sense of coherence as a protective factor for demoralisation in women with a recent diagnosis of gynaecological cancer

Boscaglia, Nadia, M. Clarke, David·2007·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Demoralisation is a dysphoric mood state commonly seen in the medically ill. Its core features comprise hopelessness, helplessness, loss of purpose and meaning, despair, and existential distress. Sense of Coherence (SOC) is a quantifiable dispositional orientation that captures the character traits likely to protect against demoralisation. In this study, we hypothesised on theoretical grounds that a strong SOC would be associated with lower levels of demoralisation in the context of gynaecological cancer (GC). METHOD: One hundred and twenty women with a recent (<12 months) diagnosis of GC were recruited from outpatient clinics. Participants were interviewed and completed questionnaire measures of demoralisation and SOC. A multiple regression analysis was performed using the five subscales of the Demoralisation Scale as predictor variables and SOC as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Together, the five subscales of the Demoralisation Scale accounted for 60% of the variance in SOC. CONCLUSIONS: The results supported the hypothesis, suggesting that SOC may be protective against demoralisation in the context of serious illness. Larger, multivariate studies that examine additional variables (such as coping) would be required to further clarify the relationship between SOC and demoralisation. In the meantime, clinicians may want to consider efforts to enhance SOC in patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.1044

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boscaglia, N., & M. Clarke, D.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Boscaglia, Nadia
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07-26
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
189-195
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2169590534
Cited by
77
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Monash University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
sense of coherence, demoralization, gynecologic cancer, women, protective factors, hopelessness, helplessness, existential suffering, coping, serious illness, psychosocial adjustment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Demography, Female, Genital Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review