Cited by 590Mental Health and PsychiatryOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Demoralization: its phenomenology and importance

Clarke, David M., Kissane, David W.·2002·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Demoralization, as described by Jerome Frank, is experienced as a persistent inability to cope, together with associated feelings of helplessness, hopelessness, meaninglessness, subjective incompetence and diminished self-esteem. It is arguably the main reason people seek psychiatric treatment, yet is a concept largely ignored in psychiatry. The aim here is to review and summarize the literature pertaining to demoralization in order to examine the validity of the construct. Method: A narrative review of demoralization and the related concepts of hope, hopelessness, and meaning is presented, drawing on a range of empirical and observational studies in the medical and psychiatric literature. Results: An examination of the concepts of the ‘Giving Up–Given Up’ syndrome (George Engel), ‘suffering’ (Eric Cassell), and demoralization (Jerome Frank), demonstrate considerable convergence of ideas. Demoralization has been commonly observed in the medically and psychiatrically ill and is experienced as existential despair, hopelessness, helplessness, and loss of meaning and purpose in life. Although sharing symptoms of distress, demoralization is distinguished from depression by subjective incompetence in the former and anhedonia in the latter. Demoralization can occur in people who are depressed, cancer patients who are not depressed and those with schizophrenia. Hopelessness, the hallmark of demoralization, is associated with poor outcomes in physical and psychiatric illness, and importantly, with suicidal ideation and the wish to die. Conclusions: Demoralization is an important construct with established descriptive and predictive validity. A place needs to be found for it in psychiatric nomenclature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01086.x

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clarke, D. M., & Kissane, D. W.
Affiliations
  • Monash Medical Centre (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Clarke, David M.
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2002-12
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
733-742
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2000720463
Cited by
590
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
FWCI
58.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bethlehem Griffiths Research Foundation
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
demoralization, hopelessness, hope, meaning in life, existential despair, anhedonia, depression, suicide, cancer patients, schizophrenia, construct validity, psychiatric terminology
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Morale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review