Cited by 442Palliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesCancer survivorship and care

The demoralization scale: a report of its development and preliminary validation

Kissane, David W., Wein, Simon, Love, Anthony, Lee, Xiu Qing, Kee, Pei Lee, Clarke, David M.·2004·Journal of Palliative Care

Abstract

The development and elaboration of a conceptualization of existential distress in patients with advanced disease is crucial in order to optimize our clinical response within palliative medicine. Demoralization is one expression of existential distress. Its empirical study will be greatly enhanced by a self-report measure that captures its dimensions and intensity. We report here on the development and testing of the Demoralization Scale in 100 patients with cancer. Factor analysis identified five relatively distinct dimensions: loss of meaning, dysphoria, disheartenment, helplessness, and sense of failure. These factors show high internal reliability, and convergent validity with the McGill Quality of Life Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Hopelessness Scale, Hunter Opinions and Personal Expectations Scale, and the Schedule of Attitudes toward Hastened Death. Its divergent validity is demonstrated through the differentiation of a subgroup of patients with high demoralization who do not meet DSM-IV categorization for a diagnosis of major depression. Confirmatory validation is needed for the scale to be used as a measure of change in interventions designed to treat demoralization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/082585970402000402

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kissane, D. W., Wein, S., Love, A., Lee, X. Q., Kee, P. L., & Clarke, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
Venue
Journal of Palliative Care
Published
2004-12
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
269-276
ISSN
  • 0825-8597 (ISSN-L)
  • 2369-5293
OpenAlex
W1862997372
Cited by
442
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
McGill University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
demoralization, existential suffering, Demoralization Scale, scale development, cancer patients, palliative care, meaninglessness, helplessness, sense of failure, dysphoria, hopelessness, major depressive disorder, self-report measures, convergent and discriminant validity
MeSH terms
Anger, Attitude to Death, Attitude to Health, Depression, Existentialism, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Guilt, Helplessness, Learned, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Morale, Neoplasms, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Terminal Care, Victoria, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review