The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subjective cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer patients: a systematic review
Abstract
Objective: Results from studies examining subjective cognitive dysfunctioning (SCD) in breast cancer (BC) patients are unclear. Therefore, this review examined (i) the prevalence of SCD, (ii) the differences between (treatment) groups in SCD, (iii) the course of SCD, (iv) the relationship of SCD with psychological factors, and (v) the relationship between SCD and objective cognitive dysfunctioning (OCD). Methods: Through a systematic literature search, we identified 27 studies concerning SCD in BC patients. The methodological quality of these studies was examined according to predefined criteria. The methodological limitations and heterogeneity across studies were taken into account. Results: Eight studies were graded of high, 12 of moderate, and seven of low quality. Twenty‐one to 90% of the patients reported SCD. The comparison between different (treatment) groups, at different time points of the cancer trajectory, rendered inconclusive evidence regarding the relation of SCD to the cancer itself, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy. SCD and OCD were unrelated, but SCD was associated with psychological distress, fatigue, and health status. Conclusions: SCD does exist in BC patients, but it remains unclear if this is more commonly found in BC patients than in the general population. It is inconclusive if SCD is developed post‐treatment or already exists pretreatment. Since there is a relationship between SCD and anxiety and depression, SCD may be more indicative of emotional distress instead of OCD. Attention toward SCD in future research is warranted in order to draw valid conclusions regarding SCD in BC patients. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., Haes, J. C. J. M. D., et al. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 · Cited by 16,005
Sprangers, M. A., Groenvold, M., Arraras, J. I., Franklin, J., te Velde, A., Muller, M., Franzini, L., Williams, A., de Haes, H. C., Hopwood, P., et al. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1996.14.10.2756 · Cited by 1,220 · cited 2×
“Studies that focused on general psychological distress found moderate Fragebogen erlebter Defizite der Aufmerksamkeit (questionnaire of experienced attention deficits) (FEDA) [52] Yes [28,30,32] Psychometric properties were tested in schizophrenic and depressive patients Multiple Ability Self-Report Questionnaire (MAS…”
MethodQuality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors: A systematic review
Mols, F., Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M., Coebergh, J. W., & van de Poll-Franse, L. V. (2005) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.05.017 · Cited by 585
Criteria for the systematic review of health promotion and public health interventions
Jackson, N., & Waters, E. (2005) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/dai022 · Cited by 572
Ganz, P. A., Kwan, L., Stanton, A. L., Krupnick, J. L., Rowland, J. H., Meyerowitz, B. E., Bower, J. E., & Belin, T. R. (2004) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djh060 · Cited by 505
Anxiety and Quality of Life of Women Who Receive Radiation or Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
Schreier, A. M., & Williams, S. A. (2004) · Oncology Nursing Forum · doi:10.1188/04.onf.127-130 · Cited by 129
Cited by
Hartman, S. J., Nelson, S. H., Myers, E., Natarajan, L., Sears, D. D., Palmer, B. W., Weiner, L. S., Parker, B. A., & Patterson, R. E. (2018) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.30987 · Cited by 188
Smith, S. G., Green, S. M. C., Ellison, R., Foy, R., Graham, C. D., Mason, E., French, D. P., Hall, L. H., Wilkes, H., McNaught, E., et al. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069971 · Cited by 20
Executive Functioning and Depressive Symptoms after Cancer: The Mediating Role of Coping
Radin, A., Ganz, P. A., Van Dyk, K., Stanton, A. L., & Bower, J. E. (2021) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000926 · Cited by 12
Hoad, K. L., Ton, C., Williamson, D., Subar, D. A., Nuttall, H. E., & Gaffney, C. J. (2026) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0341996
Metadata
- Authors
- Pullens, M. J. J., De Vries, J., & Roukema, J. A.
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10-27
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1127-1138
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W2039723351
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subjective cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer patients: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pon.1673
- The paper
- Pullens, M. J. J., De Vries, J., & Roukema, J. A. (2010). Subjective cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Psycho-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1673
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.