Cited by 12Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Executive Functioning and Depressive Symptoms after Cancer: The Mediating Role of Coping

Open access
Radin, Arielle, Ganz, Patricia A., Van Dyk, Kathleen, Stanton, Annette L., Bower, Julienne E.·2021·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive difficulties are a common complaint among patients with breast cancer and may adversely affect psychological well-being. In particular, problems with executive functioning (EF) may interfere with coping, which is known to influence depressive symptoms. The current study was designed to examine correlations between EF, coping, and depressive symptoms in breast cancer survivors and to longitudinally test the hypothesis that coping mediates the relationship between EF and depressive symptoms. Methods: Participants included 171 women with early-stage breast cancer assessed at the end of primary treatment with surgery, radiation, and/or chemotherapy and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment follow-ups as part of the Mind-Body Study. Participants completed questionnaires to assess subjective EF, approach and avoidant coping, and depressive symptoms, and neuropsychological testing was conducted to assess objective EF. Bivariate correlations were used to examine associations between EF, coping, and depressive symptoms. Mediation analyses were conducted using a bootstrapping approach (PROCESS). Results: At 1 year after treatment, objective and subjective EFs were correlated with avoidant coping ( r = −0.172 [ p = .024] and r = 0.297 [ p < .001], respectively). In longitudinal analyses, use of the avoidant strategy behavioral disengagement at 1 year mediated the association between objective (95% bootstrap confidence interval = −0.282 to −0.042) and subjective (95% bootstrap confidence interval = 0.020 to 0.254) EFs at 6 months and depressive symptoms at 2 years. Conclusions: This study highlights how problems with EF during survivorship are associated with avoidant coping and depressive symptoms. Thus, these findings identify potential cognitive and affective targets for depression intervention in this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/psy.0000000000000926

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The adoption of passive or avoidant coping strategies has a negative impact on breast cancer survivors' quality of life, influencing psychological distress and depression.

    “Other studies showed that the adoption of passive or avoidant coping strategies could have a negative impact on breast cancer survivors’ quality of life [62,63] influencing psychological distress [64,65], and depression [66].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [7]Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Spring Publishing Company; 1984: 445.
  2. [34]Ryan JJ, Lopez SJ. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III. In: Dorfman WI, Hersen M, editors. Understanding Psychological Assessment. Boston, MA: Springer; 2001.
  3. [52]Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis, Second Edition: A Regression-Based Approach. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2017.
  4. [53]Parke C Module 5: identifying and addressing outliers. In: Parke CS, editor. Essential First Steps to Data Analysis: Scenario-Based Examples Using SPSS. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2013: 81– 102.
  5. [57]Compas BE, Connor J, Osowiecki D, Welch A. Effortful and involuntary responses to stress. In: Gottlieb BH, editor. Coping With Chronic Stress. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1997: 105– 30.
  6. [58]Schmeichel BJ, Tang D. The relationship between individual differences in executive functioning and emotion regulation: a comprehensive review. In: Forgas J, E H-J, editors. The Control Within: Motivation and Its Regulation. New York: Psychology Press; 2014: 151– 70.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Radin, A., Ganz, P. A., Van Dyk, K., Stanton, A. L., & Bower, J. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Radin, Arielle
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2021-04
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
291-299
ISSN
  • 0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-7796
OpenAlex
W3133535510
Cited by
12
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH015750)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA109650)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
executive function, depressive symptoms, breast cancer survivors, coping, avoidance coping, behavioral disengagement, mediation, cognitive difficulties, depression intervention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Depression, Female, Humans, Neoplasms, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review