Cited by 135Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and careFamily Support in Illness

The experience of caregivers of hematological cancer patients undergoing a hematopoietic stem cell transplant: a comprehensive literature review

Beattie, Sara, Lebel, Sophie·2011·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is a demanding procedure with associated physical and psychological sequelae that affects patients and their families. Caregivers to HSCT patients not only have to cope with the life-threatening nature of the disease and treatment, but they also have care-giving responsibilities. This study reviews the literature on the psychosocial impact of being a caregiver to a HSCT patient. Methods A critical review of the literature published before June 2010 was conducted. Databases searched included CINAHL, Medline, PsycInfo, and Academic Search Complete, as well as a comprehensive reference review. Studies that pertained to caregivers of children (under the age of 18) undergoing a HSCT or caregivers to patients with non-hematological malignancies were excluded. Sixteen quantitative research articles and three qualitative research articles were reviewed and analyzed. Results Caregiver distress is highest pre-transplant and decreases over time, and caregivers display distress levels comparable to or higher than patients' reported distress levels. Predictors of caregiver distress include female gender, elevated subjective burden, and higher patient symptom distress. Caregivers reported uncertainty, fear of the future, juggling patients' needs with their own, and difficulties adapting to role changes; however, they also reported positive aspects to care giving, such as personal growth and developing a more positive relationship with the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.1962

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beattie, S., & Lebel, S.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Beattie, Sara
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-21
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
1137-1150
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W1971494202
Cited by
135
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, caregiver burden, caregiver distress, hematologic malignancies, subjective burden, role transition, caregiver-patient relationship
MeSH terms
Adult, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychology, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Spouses, Hematologic Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review