Cited by 75Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeHead and Neck Cancer Studies

Post-traumatic stress in head and neck cancer survivors and their partners

Moschopoulou, Elisavet, Hutchison, Iain, Bhui, Kamaldeep, Korszun, Ania·2018·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose Head and neck cancer (HNC) diagnosis and treatment are distressing and have immediate detrimental impacts on functioning and quality of life (QoL). Nevertheless, little is known about long-term psychosocial effects. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and correlates of clinical post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and subclinical post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) in HNC patients surviving more than 2 years since treatment and in their partners.Methods HNC survivors identified from the cancer registry of a London hospital and their partners completed measures of PTSS, depression and anxiety, fear of cancer recurrence, social support, appearance concerns and health-related QoL. Data regarding their clinical and demographic characteristics were also collected. Correlations, as well as linear and logistic regression coefficients, were calculated to estimate associations with PTSS scores.Results In this analysis of 93 HNC survivors, at a mean of 6 years (SD = 4) after treatment, 33.4% reported PTSS and 11.8% met the criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Fear of cancer recurrence was independently associated with PTSS (p < .01). In subgroup analyses of patient-partner dyads, 15.4% of patients and 12.8% of partners reported PTSD, with a further 33.3% of patients and 25.7% of partners demonstrating PTSS. Patients' and partners' scores did not differ significantly (p > .05).Conclusions This is the first examination of post-traumatic stress in survivors of HNC and shows that high levels of cancer-related PTSS exist for many years after diagnosis in both patients and their partners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-018-4146-9

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moschopoulou, E., Hutchison, I., Bhui, K., & Korszun, A.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Moschopoulou, Elisavet
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2018-03-15
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
3003-3011
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2793569949
Cited by
73
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Saving Faces - The Facial Surgery Research Foundation (Doctoral Scholarship)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Keywords
head and neck cancer, cancer survivors, post-traumatic stress disorder, posttraumatic stress symptoms, partners of cancer patients, fear of cancer recurrence, depression, anxiety, social support, appearance concerns, health-related quality of life
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Aged, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review