Cited by 37Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchFamily Support in Illness

Determinants of hopelessness and depression among Chinese hospitalized esophageal cancer patients and their family caregivers

Han, Yanhong, Yuan, Jie, Luo, Zhiguo, Zhao, Jing, Wu, Junbo, Liu, Rongying, Lopez, Violeta·2013·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been well documented that the diagnosis of cancer is psychologically devastating to both the patients and caregivers. The incidence and mortality of esophageal cancer were 20.85 and 16.24 per 100,000 persons and the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the fourth main cause of cancer death in China. We surveyed patients-caregivers dyad and examined the determinants of their depression and hopelessness. RESULTS: The prevalence of depression among patients and caregivers was 52.8% and 47.2%, and the prevalence for hopelessness was 64.4% and 53.9%, respectively Regression models indicate that the variables measured could explain 58.9% and 51.7% of the variance in depression and 66.8% and 45.7% of the variance in hopelessness among patients and caregivers, respectively. Overall, hopelessness was a determinant of depression and vice versa to both patients and caregivers. CONCLUSION: Esophageal patients' depression and hopelessness could also affect caregivers' depression and hopelessness despite the social support that family caregivers have. Psychosocial interventions should be planned to both Chinese patients and caregivers considering the predictors found in this study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.3315

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Han, Y., Yuan, J., Luo, Z., Zhao, J., Wu, J., Liu, R., & Lopez, V.
Affiliations
  • Hubei University of Medicine (CN)
  • School of Nursing Hubei University of Medicine Shiyan Hubei China
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-05-23
Volume
22
Issue
11
Pages
2529-2536
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W1713176083
Cited by
37
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine Affiliated Hospital (2011D29)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
esophageal cancer, hopelessness, depression, family caregivers, hospitalized cancer patients, patient-caregiver dyads, social support, psychosocial interventions, Chinese patients
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Death, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Esophageal Neoplasms, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Prevalence, Caregivers, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review