Cited by 98Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic Care

The effect of spiritual interventions addressing existential themes using a narrative approach on quality of life of cancer patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Open access
Kruizinga, Renske, Hartog, Iris D., Jacobs, Marc, Daams, Joost G., Scherer‐Rath, Michael, Schilderman, Johannes B. A. M., Sprangers, Mirjam A. G., Van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.·2016·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of spiritual interventions on quality of life of cancer patients. Methods: We conducted our search on June 6, 2014 in Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, and PubMed. All clinical trials were included that compared standard care with a spiritual intervention that addressed existential themes using a narrative approach. Study quality was evaluated by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Results: A total of 4972 studies were identified, of which 14 clinical trials (2050 patients) met the inclusion criteria, and 12 trials (1878 patients) were included in the meta‐analysis. The overall risk of bias was high. When combined, all studies showed a moderate effect (d) 0.50 (95% CI = 0.20–0.79) 0–2 weeks after the intervention on overall quality of life in favor of the spiritual interventions. Meta‐analysis at 3–6 months after the intervention showed a small insignificant effect (0.14, 95% CI = −0.08 to 0.35). Subgroup analysis including only the western studies showed a small effect of 0.17 (95% CI = 0.05–0.29). Including only studies that met the allocation concealment criteria showed an insignificant effect of 0.14 (95% CI = −0.05 to 0.33). Conclusions: Directly after the intervention, spiritual interventions had a moderate beneficial effect in terms of improving quality of life of cancer patients compared with that of a control group. No evidence was found that the interventions maintained this effect up to 3–6 months after the intervention. Further research is needed to understand how spiritual interventions could contribute to a long‐term effect of increasing or maintaining quality of life. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.3910

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies assessing complementary interventions, such as music-based interventions or mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), showed beneficial effects in cancer patients; yet results were often heterogeneous.

    “Additionally, studies assessing complementary interventions, such as music-based interventions or mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), showed beneficial effects in cancer patients; yet results were often heterogeneous [80–84].”

    From A clinical trial of group-based body psychotherapy to improve bodily disturbances in post-treatment cancer patients in combination with randomized controlled smartphone-triggered bodily interventions (KPTK): Study protocol (2019) · cites this paper as [82]

    The Summary of evidence (p. 256) reports improved short-term quality of life in cancer patients after narrative spiritual interventions, and Future research (p. 258) describes substantial heterogeneity across the included studies. This paper does not assess the sentence’s examples of music-based interventions or mindfulness-based stress reduction, so it supports the general benefit-and-heterogeneity point but not those examples. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Moadel A, Morgan C, Fatone A, Grennan J, Carter J, Laruffa G, et al. Seeking meaning and hope: self-reported spiritual and existen- tial needs among an ethnically diverse cancer patient population. Psycho-Oncology 1999;8 (5):378-385.
  2. Ricoeur P. Time and Narrative, Vol. 3. Univer- sity of Chicago Press: Chigaco, 1984; 2010.
  3. Ricoeur P. Time and Narrative (Temps et Récit), Vol. 3. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1984;281.
  4. Cohen SR, Mount BM, Tomas JJ, Mount LF. Existential well-being is an important deter- minant of quality of life: evidence from the McGill quality of life questionnaire. Cancer 1996;77(3):576-586.
  5. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Vol. 5. Wiley Online Library Ltd: Chichester, UK, 2008.
  6. NEA Committee. Ethical Guidelines for Inter- vention Studies (revised ed.), Ministry of Health: Wellington, New Zealand, 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kruizinga, R., Hartog, I. D., Jacobs, M., Daams, J. G., Scherer‐Rath, M., Schilderman, J. B. A. M., Sprangers, M. A. G., & Van Laarhoven, H. W. M.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Kruizinga, Renske
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08-10
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
253-265
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2098859660
Cited by
96
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Dutch Cancer Society/Alpe d'HuZes (UVA 2011-5311)
  • Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
spiritual intervention, existential themes, narrative approach, quality of life, cancer patients, long-term intervention effects, risk of bias
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, Psychotherapy, Quality of Life, Spirituality, Narrative Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review