Cited by 40Cancer survivorship and careDigital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Telephone‐delivered individual cognitive behavioural therapy for cancer patients: An equivalence randomised trial

Open access
Watson, M., White, C., Lynch, A., Mohammed, K.·2017·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate Telephone‐Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (T‐CBT) compared to CBT face to face treatment as usual (TAU‐CBT), in cancer patients with high psychological needs, in terms of mental health and coping. Method: A prospective randomised equivalence trial with Patient Reported Outcome (PRO's), measured pre‐ and post‐therapy including; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale: Helpless/Hopeless subscale only (MAC H/H), Checklist of Cancer Concerns (CLCC) and the Cancer Coping Questionnaire (CCQ). A study‐specific Service Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ) was include. Results: Assessment of change scores, in n = 118 randomised patients referred for psychological care, indicate significant improvements (P < 0.01 or greater) for both therapy groups pre‐ and post‐therapy in HADS anxiety, depression and total scores and cancer concerns (CLCC). Overall, for the groups combined, there is a significant shift towards reduction of CCQ stress (P = 0.028) and worry (P = 0.003) post‐therapy when compared to baseline levels. Median number of therapy sessions was four. For cancer coping (CCQ) and for Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) there were significant change scores only for Positive Focus and Helpless/hopeless scores respectively, in the TAU‐CBT group. Although equivalence was not observed, the data demonstrate that T‐CBT was non‐inferior to TAU‐CBT. Conclusions: Delivery of CBT to patients with clinician identified high need can be offered according to patient choice without loss of mental health benefit. Both TAU‐CBT and T‐CBT are effective at reducing mental health problems on the specific outcome measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.4338

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBT for cancer patients is equally beneficial when delivered by phone or in person.

    “Cognitive-behavioral therapy with cancer patients was found to be equally beneficial when delivered by phone or in person (Watson et al., 2017).”

    From Utilizing a Manualized Therapy to Provide Parallel Treatment to Older Adults With Cancer and Their Caregivers: A Case Study (2022) · cites this paper as Watson et al., 2017

    The Discussion says both delivery methods reduced the measured mental-health outcomes, and the trial found telephone CBT non-inferior to face-to-face CBT. However, Results §3.3 says full equivalence was not established, and the study concerned cancer patients referred for psychological care with high psychological needs—not cancer patients generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Holland J, Watson M, Dunn J. The IPOS New International Standard of Quality Cancer Care: integrating the psychosocial domain into routine care. Psycho-Oncology. 2011;20:677-680.
  2. DuHamel KN, Mosher CE, Winkel G, et al. Randomized clinical trial of telephone-administered cognitive-behavioral therapy to reduce post- traumatic stress disorder and distress symptoms after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3754-3756.
  3. Sherman DW, Haber J, Hoskins CN, et al. The effects of psycho-educa- tion and telephone counselling on the adjustment of women with early- stage cancer. Appl Nurs Res. 2010;25:3-16.
  4. Sandgren AK, McCaul KD. Long-term telephone therapy outcomes for breast cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology. 2007;16:38-47.
  5. Watson M, White C, Davolls S, Mohammed A, Lynch A, Mohammed K. Problem-focussed interactive telephone therapy [ProFITT©] for cancer patients: A Phase II feasibility trial. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22:1485- 1491.
  6. Okuyama S, Jones W, Ricklefs C, Tran ZV. Psychosocial telephone interventions for patients with cancer and survivors: a systematic review. Psycho-Oncology. 2015;24(8):857-870.
  7. Moorey S, Greer S, Watson M, et al. Adjuvant psychological therapy for patients with cancer: outcome at one year. Psycho-Oncology. 1994;3:39-48.
  8. Altman D, Schulz K, Moher D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials; Explanations and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:663-694.
  9. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II) Part I: descrip- tion. J Pers Disord. 1995;9:83-91.
  10. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361-370.
  11. Watson M, Greer S, Young J, Inayat Q, Burgess C, Robertson C. Devel- opment of a questionnaire measure of adjustment to cancer: the MAC scale. Psych Med. 1988;18:203-209.
  12. Harrison J, Maguire P, Ibbotson T, Macleod R, Hopwood P. Concerns, confiding and psychiatric disorder in newly diagnosed cancer patients: a descriptive study. Psycho-Oncology. 1994;3:173-179.
  13. Moorey S, Frampton M, Greer S. The cancer coping questionnaire: a self-rating scale for measuring the impact of adjuvant psychological therapy on coping behaviour. Psycho-Oncology. 2003;12:331-344.
  14. Rodgers M, Asaria M, Walker S, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of low-intensity psychological interventions for the secondary prevention of relapse after depression: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(28). doi: 10.3310/hta16280 · DOI
  15. Layard R, Clark DM. Why more psychological therapy would cost nothing. Frontiers in Psychology|www.frontiersin.org 2015; Volume 6, Article 1713.
  16. Toerien M, Brookes ST, Metcalfe C, de Salis I, et al. A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCT's in six major journals. Trials. 2009;10:
  17. Chambers SK, Hutchison S, Clutton S, Dunn J. Psycho-oncology Research: meeting future challenges. Aust Psychol. 2013;49: 96-103.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watson, M., White, C., Lynch, A., & Mohammed, K.
Affiliations
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Watson, M.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-30
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
301-308
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2566356793
Cited by
40
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
cancer patients, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, coping with cancer, mental adjustment to cancer, non-inferiority, psychological care
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Telephone, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review