Cited by 41Cancer survivorship and careArt Therapy and Mental HealthDigital Mental Health Interventions

Telephone-based reminiscence therapy for colorectal cancer patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy complicated with depression: a three-arm randomised controlled trial

Dong, Xiaomei, Sun, Guangwei, Zhan, Jiaoyang, Liu, Fang, Ma, Siping, Li, Penglei, Zhang, Chan, Zhang, Huijie +2 more·2019·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Background Colorectal cancer patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy often exhibit symptoms of depression that in turn may negatively affect outcome. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of telephone-based reminiscence therapy on the depression, anxiety, subjective well-being, and social support of colorectal cancer patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy complicated with depression. Methods Patients were divided randomly into a control group (CON, n = 45), telephone support group (TS, n = 45), and telephone-based reminiscence therapy group (TBR, n = 45). Patients in TS and TBR groups received six 20-40-min telephone intervention sessions conducted weekly. Patients were assessed at baseline and at 6 weeks. The primary outcomes were changes on the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), which were used to evaluate depression symptoms. Secondary outcomes were changes in Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness (MUNSH), and Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) scores, which were used to evaluate anxiety symptoms, subjective well-being, and social support, respectively. Results After 6 weeks, SDS and HAMD scores were significantly lower than pre-intervention baseline in the TBR group but not in the CON and TS groups (P 0.05). Neither telephone support nor telephone-based reminiscence therapy improved subjective well-being or social support (P >…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-018-4566-6

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dong, X., Sun, G., Zhan, J., Liu, F., Ma, S., Li, P., Zhang, C., Zhang, H., Xing, C., & Liu, Y.
Affiliations
  • First Hospital of China Medical University (CN)
  • Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute (CN)
  • Shenyang Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Xing, Chengzhong
  • Liu, Ying
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2018-12-04
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
2761-2769
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2902957414
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Chinese Natural Science Foundation (No. 81472853)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
reminiscence therapy, telephone-delivered intervention, colorectal cancer, postoperative chemotherapy, depression, anxiety, subjective well-being, social support, telephone support, mental health of cancer patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Anxiety, Combined Modality Therapy, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Care, Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy, Group, Social Support, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Telephone, Colorectal Neoplasms, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review