Cited by 141Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Telehealth versus face-to-face psychotherapy for less common mental health conditions: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Open access
Greenwood, Hannah, Krzyzaniak, Natalia, Peiris, Ruwani, Clark, Justin, Scott, Anna Mae, Cardona, Magnolia, Griffith, Rebecca, Glasziou, Paul·2022·JMIR Mental Health

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mental disorders are a leading cause of distress and disability worldwide. To meet patient demand, there is a need for increased access to high-quality, evidence-based mental health care. Telehealth has become well established in the treatment of illnesses, including mental health conditions. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to conduct a robust evidence synthesis to assess whether there is evidence of differences between telehealth and face-to-face care for the management of less common mental and physical health conditions requiring psychotherapy. METHODS: In this systematic review, we included randomized controlled trials comparing telehealth (telephone, video, or both) versus the face-to-face delivery of psychotherapy for less common mental health conditions and physical health conditions requiring psychotherapy. The psychotherapy delivered had to be comparable between the telehealth and face-to-face groups, and it had to be delivered by general practitioners, primary care nurses, or allied health staff (such as psychologists and counselors). Patient (symptom severity, overall improvement in psychological symptoms, and function), process (working alliance and client satisfaction), and financial (cost) outcomes were included. RESULTS: A total of 12 randomized controlled trials were included, with 931 patients in aggregate; therapies included cognitive behavioral and family therapies delivered in populations encompassing addiction disorders, eating disorders, childhood mental health problems, and chronic conditions. Telehealth was delivered by video in 7 trials, by telephone in 3 trials, and by both in 1 trial, and the delivery mode was unclear in 1 trial. The risk of bias for the 12 trials was low or unclear for most domains, except for the lack of the blinding of participants, owing to the nature of the comparison. There were no significant differences in symptom severity between telehealth and face-to-face therapy immediately after treatment (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.05, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.27) or at any other follow-up time point. Similarly, there were no significant differences immediately after treatment between telehealth and face-to-face care delivery on any of the other outcomes meta-analyzed, including overall improvement (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.39), function (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.42), working alliance client (SMD 0.11, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.57), working alliance therapist (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.91 to 0.59), and client satisfaction (SMD 0.12, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.53), or at any other time point (3, 6, and 12 months). CONCLUSIONS: With regard to effectively treating less common mental health conditions and physical conditions requiring psychological support, there is insufficient evidence of a difference between psychotherapy delivered via telehealth and the same therapy delivered face-to-face. However, there was no includable evidence in this review for some serious mental health conditions, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorders, and further high-quality research is needed to determine whether telehealth is a viable, equivalent treatment option for these conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/31780

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital therapy is just as effective as in-person therapy in improving clinical outcomes.

    “Evidence suggests that digital therapy is just as effective as in-person therapy in improving clinical outcomes”

    From Predictors and Correlates of Depression and Anxiety Symptom Trajectories in a Large Digital Mental Health Provider: Retrospective Analysis of Data From Rula Health (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Results report no significant differences in symptom severity or overall improvement between telehealth and face-to-face psychotherapy. But the Conclusions explicitly say the authors cannot conclude the approaches are equivalent, and the review concerns telephone- or video-delivered psychotherapy for less common mental health conditions and physical conditions requiring psychological support—not digital therapy generally. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The psychological treatment delivery format via video calls has proven to be as effective as traditional in-person treatments.

    “This psychological treatment delivery format has proven to be as effective as traditional in-person treatments (Berryhill et al., 2019; Greenwood et al., 2022).”

    From Evaluation of effectiveness and acceptability of a psychological treatment for smoking cessation combined with a smartphone App: A pilot study (2024) · cites this paper as Greenwood et al., 2022

    The Discussion (Principal Findings) reports no significant outcome differences between telehealth and face-to-face psychotherapy in 12 trials, but the interventions included telephone as well as video delivery. It describes the evidence as insufficient to establish a difference, with confidence intervals often too wide to rule out a meaningful difference. The claim therefore overstates both the certainty of equivalence and the video-specific evidence. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [26]Scopus Elsevier B.V 2021 2021-12-01 https://www.scopus.com/search/form.uri?display=basic#basic
  2. [28]Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.4 The Cochrane Collaboration 2020 2022-02-11 https://training.cochrane.org/online-learning/core-software-cochrane-reviews/revman/revman-non-cochrane-reviews

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenwood, H., Krzyzaniak, N., Peiris, R., Clark, J., Scott, A. M., Cardona, M., Griffith, R., & Glasziou, P.
Affiliations
Bond University (AU)
Corresponding author
Greenwood, Hannah
Venue
JMIR Mental Health
Published
2022-03-11
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
e31780
ISSN
2368-7959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4221029000
Cited by
141
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 7
FWCI
5.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bond University Research Portal (Bond University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
telemedicine, face-to-face psychotherapy, videoconferencing, telephone-delivered therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, family therapy, addiction, eating disorders, child psychopathology, chronic disease, therapeutic relationship, client satisfaction, cost-effectiveness, access to mental health care, general practitioners, primary care nurses, allied health professionals, symptom severity, functional outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review