Cited by 106Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and careDigital Mental Health Interventions

Quality of life among women diagnosed with breast Cancer: A randomized waitlist controlled trial of commercially available mobile app‐delivered mindfulness training

Rosen, Kristen D., Paniagua, Samantha M., Kazanis, William, Jones, Shaun, Potter, Jennifer Sharpe·2018·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of commercially available mobile app‐delivered mindfulness training (AMT), compared with waitlist control (WC), on quality of life (QOL) among women diagnosed with breast cancer. The secondary outcome was dispositional mindfulness. Enrollment, app utilization, and study completion are reported as feasibility objectives. Methods: Women diagnosed with breast cancer ≤5 years (n = 112) were randomized to AMT (n = 57) or WC (n = 55), over 8 weeks, with 4 weeks of follow‐up. We conducted linear mixed effects models to examine group by observation interactions on QOL and dispositional mindfulness at baseline, during intervention (5‐weeks), post‐intervention (9‐weeks), and follow‐up (12‐weeks post‐baseline). Results: Participants assigned to AMT reported higher QOL, compared with those assigned to WC, from baseline through follow‐up t(258.40) = 3.09, P < 0.01, 95% CI [2.71, 11.90]. Participants assigned to AMT also reported higher dispositional mindfulness, compared with those assigned to WC, from baseline through follow‐up t(268.44) = 2.04, P = 0.04, 95% CI [0.01, 0.57]. App utilization data was obtained from 34 participants. Fewer participants assigned to AMT completed all study assessments, compared with participants assigned to WC, (χ2 1 = 7.07, P = 0.008). Conclusions: Findings suggest commercially available AMT may proffer some benefit to women seeking to enhance their QOL following breast cancer diagnosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.4764

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosen, K. D., Paniagua, S. M., Kazanis, W., Jones, S., & Potter, J. S.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rosen, Kristen D.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-06
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
2023-2030
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2803161153
Cited by
106
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8
FWCI
12.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Texas at San Antonio
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
breast cancer, quality of life, mindfulness training, mobile health apps, trait mindfulness, waitlist control, feasibility, women with cancer
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Waiting Lists, Mobile Applications, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review