The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review
Abstract
The aim of this review paper is to critique the empirical literature pertaining to the communication needs and goals of cancer patients, and to provide direction for research in this area. According to the conceptual framework of Feldman‐Stewart et al., patient–physician communication occurs for the fundamental purpose of addressing each participant's goal(s). This review is divided into two categories of goals: (a) optimal medical management of the cancer, and (b) optimal attention to the patient's psychosocial response to cancer. Optimal medical management includes discussions about disease status and the treatment plan, and the effectiveness of these discussions is frequently determined by assessing patient understanding, satisfaction, and well‐being. The literature suggests that cancer patients continue to have unmet communication needs, and communication outcomes are enhanced when physicians attend to the emotional needs of patients. Research gaps in communication research are highlighted, including the need for additional study of several external factors affecting the patient and provider. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychiatric morbidity and its recognition by doctors in patients with cancer
Fallowfield, L., Ratcliffe, D., Jenkins, V, & Saul, J. (2001) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1054/bjoc.2001.1724 · Cited by 694 · cited 1×
“Yet oncologists tend to misclassify and underestimate (Fallowfield et al., 2001; Ford et al., 1994) the degree of patient distress, and this suggests an inability of oncologists to be patient-centered.”
BackgroundZachariae, R., Pedersen, C. G., Jensen, A. B., Ehrnrooth, E., Rossen, P. B., & von der Maase, H. (2003) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600798 · Cited by 601 · cited 2×
“Patient satisfaction with personal contact with the physician and with the physician’s handling of medical care issues are significantly associated with the perception that the physician is attentive and empathic (Zachariae et al., 2003).”
BackgroundTruth may hurt but deceit hurts more: communication in palliative care
Fallowfield, L. J., Jenkins, V. A., & Beveridge, H. A. (2002) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1191/0269216302pm575oa · Cited by 498
When the treatment goal is not cure: are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions?
Gattellari, M., Voigt, K. J., Butow, P. N., & Tattersall, M. H. N. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2002.20.2.503 · Cited by 344
Assessing Information and Decision Preferences of Men With Prostate Cancer and Their Partners
Davison, B. J., Gleave, M. E., Goldenberg, S. L., Degner, L. F., Hoffart, D., & Berkowitz, J. (2002) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/00002820-200202000-00009 · Cited by 230
Self-citationESSEN, L. V., LARSSON, G., ÖBERG, K., & SJÖDÉN, P. O. (2002) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2354.2002.00293.x · Cited by 176 · cited 1×
“In a Swedish study that assessed patient satisfaction with care, the lowest satisfaction scores were obtained for the categories of ‘doctor’s interpersonal skills’ and ‘nurses’ communication skills’ (Von Essen et al., 2002).”
Background
Cited by
Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer
Moore, P. M., Rivera Mercado, S., Grez Artigues, M., & Lawrie, T. A. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003751.pub3 · Cited by 452
Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer
Moore, P. M., Rivera, S., Bravo-Soto, G. A., Olivares, C., & Lawrie, T. A. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003751.pub4 · Cited by 302
Receipt of Psychosocial Care Among Cancer Survivors in the United States
Forsythe, L. P., Kent, E. E., Weaver, K. E., Buchanan, N., Hawkins, N. A., Rodriguez, J. L., Ryerson, A. B., & Rowland, J. H. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.46.2101 · Cited by 157
Chen, C. H., Kuo, S. C., & Tang, S. T. (2017) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216316663976 · Cited by 146
Zhang, R., Duan, W., Flathmann, C., McNeese, N., Freeman, G., & Williams, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610072 · Cited by 134
Jelin, E., Granum, V., & Eide, H. (2012) · Pain Management Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2011.08.008 · Cited by 35
Moehring, A., Schroeders, U., Leichtmann, B., & Wilhelm, O. (2016) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2016.10.003 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Hack, T. F., Degner, L. F., & Parker, P. A.
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09-30
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 831-845
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W1977982721
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 24.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
