Cited by 85Infant Development and Preterm CareInfant Health and DevelopmentNeonatal and fetal brain pathology

Impact of hands-on care on infant sleep in the neonatal intensive care unit

Open access
Levy, Jennifer, Hassan, Fauziya, Plegue, Melissa A., Sokoloff, Max D., Kushwaha, Juhi S., Chervin, Ronald D., Barks, John D.E., Shellhaas, Renée A.·2017·Pediatric Pulmonology

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Sleep disruption is increasingly recognized in hospitalized patients. Impaired sleep is associated with measureable alterations in neurodevelopment. The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) environment has the potential to affect sleep quality and quantity. We aimed: (i) to determine the frequency and duration of hands-on care, and its impact on sleep, for NICU patients; and (ii) to assess the incidence of respiratory events associated with handling for a cohort of sick neonates. METHODS: Term and near-term neonates admitted to the NICU and at risk for cerebral dysfunction due to severity of illness or clinical suspicion for seizures underwent attended, bedside polysomnography. Continuous polysomnogram segments were analyzed and data on handling, infant behavioral state, and associated respiratory events were recorded. RESULTS: Video and polysomnography data were evaluated for 25 infants (gestational age 39.4 ± 1.6 weeks). The maximum duration between handling episodes for each infant was 50.9 ± 26.2 min, with a median of 2.3 min between contacts. Handling occurred across all behavioral states (active sleep 29.5%; quiet sleep 23.1%; awake 29.9%; indeterminate 17.4%; P = 0.99). Arousals or awakenings occurred in 57% of contacts with a sleeping infant. Hypopnea, apnea, and oxygen desaturation occurred with 16%, 8%, and 19.5% of contacts, respectively. Hypopnea was most likely to occur following contact with infants in active sleep (28%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Infants in the NICU experience frequent hands-on care, associated with disturbances of sleep and respiration. The potential health and developmental impact of these disturbances merits study, as strategies to monitor sleep and minimize sleep-disordered breathing might then improve NICU outcomes. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52:84-90 © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ppul.23513

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few studies report the correlation of PAT with SBP in infants, mainly in the context of sleep studies and as a screening method rather than a core clinical tool, and none report measurements of PTT in this critical care population.

    “Few studies report the correlation of PAT with SBP in infants, mainly in the context of sleep studies and as screening method rather than a core clinical tool.35,36 None report measurements of PTT in this critical care population.”

    From Skin-interfaced biosensors for advanced wireless physiological monitoring in neonatal and pediatric intensive-care units (2020) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Polysomnography and Discussion sections describe infant sleep monitoring and respiratory events, but do not discuss pulse arrival time (PAT), its correlation with systolic blood pressure (SBP), or its use as a screening method. Searches for PAT/SBP and pulse transit time (PTT) found no passage addressing those claims or establishing that no PTT measurements have been reported in this population. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levy, J., Hassan, F., Plegue, M. A., Sokoloff, M. D., Kushwaha, J. S., Chervin, R. D., Barks, J. D. E., & Shellhaas, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Shellhaas, Renée A.
Venue
Pediatric Pulmonology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-30
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
84-90
ISSN
  • 1099-0496 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-6863
OpenAlex
W2465157982
Cited by
85
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Pulmonology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (NICHD) (5K23HD068402)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Keywords
infant sleep, neonatal intensive care unit, sleep disruption, sleep-disordered breathing, hypopnea, apnea, oxygen desaturation, arousal, active sleep, quiet sleep, neonatal handling, polysomnography, brain development
MeSH terms
Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Male, Respiration, Sleep, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review