Cited by 37HIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentHIV Research and TreatmentProtein Structure and Dynamics

Allosteric HIV‐1 integrase inhibitors promote aberrant protein multimerization by directly mediating inter‐subunit interactions: Structural and thermodynamic modeling studies

Open access
Deng, Nanjie, Hoyte, Ashley, Mansour, Yara E., Mohamed, Mosaad S., Fuchs, James R., Engelman, Alan N., Kvaratskhelia, Mamuka, Levy, Ronald·2016·Protein Science

Abstract

Allosteric HIV‐1 integrase (IN) inhibitors (ALLINIs) bind at the dimer interface of the IN catalytic core domain (CCD), and potently inhibit HIV‐1 by promoting aberrant, higher‐order IN multimerization. Little is known about the structural organization of the inhibitor‐induced IN multimers and important questions regarding how ALLINIs promote aberrant IN multimerization remain to be answered. On the basis of physical chemistry principles and from our analysis of experimental information, we propose that inhibitor‐induced multimerization is mediated by ALLINIs directly promoting inter‐subunit interactions between the CCD dimer and a C‐terminal domain (CTD) of another IN dimer. Guided by this hypothesis, we have built atomic models of inter‐subunit interfaces in IN multimers by incorporating information from hydrogen‐deuterium exchange (HDX) measurements to drive protein‐protein docking. We have also developed a novel free energy simulation method to estimate the effects of ALLINI binding on the association of the CCD and CTD. Using this structural and thermodynamic modeling approach, we show that multimer inter‐subunit interface models can account for several experimental observations about ALLINI‐induced multimerization, including large differences in the potencies of various ALLINIs, the mechanisms of resistance mutations, and the crucial role of solvent exposed R‐groups in the high potency of certain ALLINIs. Our study predicts that CTD residues Tyr226, Trp235 and Lys266 are involved in the aberrant multimer interfaces. The key finding of the study is that it suggests the possibility of ALLINIs facilitating inter‐subunit interactions between an external CTD and the CCD‐CCD dimer interface.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.2997

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The common biochemical consequence of ALLINI binding is aberrant HIV-1 integrase hyper-multimerization.

    “The common biochemical consequence of ALLINI binding is aberrant HIV-1 IN hyper-multimerization140,142,174–181.”

    From Structure and function of retroviral integrase (2022) · cites this paper as [178]

  • Mass spectrometry footprinting, mutagenesis, and computational chemistry support this mode of integrase aggregation by ALLINIs.

    “Solution measurements using mass spectrometry footprinting techniques, mutagenesis and computational chemistry strongly support this mode of IN aggregation by ALLINIs178,189.”

    From Structure and function of retroviral integrase (2022) · cites this paper as [178]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deng, N., Hoyte, A., Mansour, Y. E., Mohamed, M. S., Fuchs, J. R., Engelman, A. N., Kvaratskhelia, M., & Levy, R.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Helwan University (EG)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Deng, Nanjie
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08-17
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
1911-1917
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W2519497863
Cited by
36
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (P50GM103368 (to RML, ANE and MK), GM30580 (to RML), R01AI110310 (to MK and JRF))
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
HIV-1 integrase, integrase multimerization, intersubunit interactions, catalytic core domain, C-terminal domain, hydrogen-deuterium exchange, protein-protein docking, free energy simulation, drug resistance mutations, solvent-exposed residues
MeSH terms
Allosteric Regulation, Models, Chemical, Models, Molecular, Structure-Activity Relationship, HIV-1, HIV Integrase, HIV Integrase Inhibitors, Protein Multimerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review