Cited by 160Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

Intrinsic protein disorder and conditional folding in AlphaFoldDB

Open access
Piovesan, Damiano, Monzon, Alexander Miguel, Tosatto, Silvio C. E.·2022·Protein Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) defying the traditional protein structure-function paradigm have been difficult to analyze. The availability of accurate structure predictions on a large scale in AlphaFoldDB offers a fresh perspective on IDR prediction. Here, we establish three baselines for IDR prediction from AlphaFoldDB models based on the recent CAID dataset. Surprisingly, AlphaFoldDB is highly competitive for predicting both IDRs and conditionally folded binding regions, demonstrating the plasticity of the disorder to structure continuum.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.4466

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preliminary studies suggest most targets with very low pLDDT (<50) are likely IDPs/IDRs rather than well-folded proteins AF2 fails to predict.

    “Preliminary studies suggest that the majority of targets with very low-confidence score (pLDDT < 50) assigned by AF2 are likely to be IDPs / IDRs rather than well-folded structures that AF2 fails to predict42–44”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [1]Kryshtafovych A, Schwede T, Topf M, Fidelis K, Moult J. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XIV. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform. 2021; 89: 1607– 1617. PMC8726744 34533838
  2. [4]Subramaniam S, Kleywegt GJ. A paradigm shift in structural biology. Nat Methods. 2022; 19: 20– 23. 35017736
  3. [5]Cramer P. AlphaFold2 and the future of structural biology. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2021; 28: 704– 705. 34376855
  4. [11]Tompa P, Fersht A. Structure and Function of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins. New York: CRC Press, 2009.
  5. [12]Wright PE, Dyson HJ. Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015; 16: 18– 29. 25531225 PMC4405151
  6. [14]Quaglia F, Mészáros B, Salladini E, et al. DisProt in 2022: Improved quality and accessibility of protein intrinsic disorder annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50: D480– D487. 34850135 PMC8728214
  7. [16]Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 1983; 22: 2577– 2637. 6667333
  8. [17]Rost B, Sander C. Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma. 1994; 20: 216– 226. 7892171
  9. [18]Hamelryck T, Manderick B. PDB file parser and structure class implemented in python. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19: 2308– 2310. 14630660
  10. [19]Mészáros B, Erdős G, Dosztányi Z. IUPred2A: Context‐dependent prediction of protein disorder as a function of redox state and protein binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46: W329– W337. 29860432 PMC6030935
  11. [20]Mészáros B, Simon I, Dosztányi Z. Prediction of protein binding regions in disordered proteins. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009; 5: e1000376. 19412530 PMC2671142
  12. [21]Sormanni P, Piovesan D, Heller GT, et al. Simultaneous quantification of protein order and disorder. Nat Chem Biol. 2017; 13: 339– 342. 28328918
  13. [22]Hu G, Katuwawala A, Wang K, et al. flDPnn: Accurate intrinsic disorder prediction with putative propensities of disorder functions. Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 4438. 34290238 PMC8295265

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piovesan, D., Monzon, A. M., & Tosatto, S. C. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences University of Padova Padova Italy
Corresponding author
Tosatto, Silvio C. E.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-10-26
Volume
31
Issue
11
Pages
e4466-e4466
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4303983095
Cited by
160
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 6
FWCI
10.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (778247)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
intrinsically disordered regions, protein structure prediction
MeSH terms
Protein Conformation, Protein Folding, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review