The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of conformational characteristics in structurally similar protein pairs
Open accessAbstract
Although it is known that three‐dimensional structure is well conserved during the evolutionary development of proteins, there have been few studies that consider other parameters apart from divergence of the main‐chain coordinates. In this study, we align the structures of 90 pairs of homologous proteins having sequence identities ranging from 5 to 100%. Their structures are compared as a function of sequence identity, including not only consideration of C α coordinates but also accessibility, Ooi numbers, secondary structure, and side‐chain angles. We discuss how these properties change as the sequences become less similar. This will be of practical use in homology modeling, especially for modeling very distantly related or analogous proteins. We also consider how the average size and number of insertions and deletions vary as sequences diverge. This study presents further quantitative evidence that structure is remarkably well conserved in detail, as well as at the topological level, even when the sequences do not show similarity that is significant statistically.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins.
Chothia, C., & Lesk, A. M. (1986) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04288.x · Cited by 2,458
A new approach to protein fold recognition
Jones, D. T., Taylort, W. R., & Thornton, J. M. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/358086a0 · Cited by 1,221
Self-citation
Cited by
Modeling of loops in protein structures
Fiser, A., Do, R. K. G., & Šali, A. (2000) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.9.9.1753 · Cited by 2,116
Fold Change in Evolution of Protein Structures
Grishin, N. V. (2001) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1006/jsbi.2001.4335 · Cited by 444
RING fingers and B-boxes: zinc-binding protein-protein interaction domains
Borden, K. L. B. (1998) · Biochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1139/bcb-76-2-3-351 · Cited by 261
Sequence Variations within Protein Families are Linearly Related to Structural Variations
Koehl, P., & Levitt, M. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00971-3 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Flores, T. P., Orengo, C. A., Moss, D. S., & Thornton, J. M.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1811-1826
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2074235299
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of conformational characteristics in structurally similar protein pairs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pro.5560021104
- The paper
- Flores, T. P., Orengo, C. A., Moss, D. S., & Thornton, J. M. (1993). Comparison of conformational characteristics in structurally similar protein pairs. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560021104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.