The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
N‐ and C‐capping preferences for all 20 amino acids in α‐helical peptides
Open accessAbstract
We have determined the N‐ and C‐capping preferences of all 20 amino acids by substituting residue X in the peptides NH 2‐XAKAAAAKAAAAKAAGY‐CONH 2 and in Ac‐YGAAKAAAAKAAAAKAX‐CO 2 H. Helix contents were measured by CD spectroscopy to obtain rank orders of capping preferences. The data were further analyzed by our modified Lifson‐Roig helix‐coil theory, which includes capping parameters (n and c), to find free energies of capping (‐RT In n and —RT In c), relative to Ala. Results were obtained for charged and uncharged termini and for different charged states of titratable side chains. N‐cap preferences varied from Asn (best) to Gin (worst). We find, as expected, that amino acids that can accept hydrogen bonds from otherwise free backbone NH groups, such as Asn, Asp, Ser, Thr, and Cys generally have the highest N‐cap preference. Gly and the acetyl group are favored, as are negative charges in side chains and at the N‐terminus. Our N‐cap preference scale agrees well with preferences in proteins. In contrast, we find little variation when changing the identity of the C‐cap residue. We find no preference for Gly at the C‐cap in contrast to the situation in proteins. Both N‐cap and C‐cap results for Tyr and Trp are inaccurate because their aromatic groups affect the CD spectrum. The data presented here are of value in rationalizing mutations at capping sites in proteins and in predicting the helix contents of peptides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chou, P. Y., & Fasman, G. D. (1974) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00699a001 · Cited by 2,172
Elucidating the folding problem of helical peptides using empirical parameters
Muñoz, V., & Serrano, L. (1994) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0694-399 · Cited by 721
Stabilization of alpha-helical structures in short peptides via end capping
Forood, B., Feliciano, E. J., & Nambiar, K. P. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.3.838 · Cited by 235
Cited by
Rohl, C. A., Chakrabartty, A., & Baldwin, R. L. (1996) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5560051225 · Cited by 256
Self-citationStructure of complete Pol II–DSIF–PAF–SPT6 transcription complex reveals RTF1 allosteric activation
Vos, S. M., Farnung, L., Linden, A., Urlaub, H., & Cramer, P. (2020) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-020-0437-1 · Cited by 160
Liu, Q., Berry, D., Nash, P., Pawson, T., McGlade, C. J., & Li, S. S.-C. (2003) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00046-7 · Cited by 119
Mallart, S., Ingenito, R., Bianchi, E., Bresciani, A., Esposito, S., Gallo, M., Magotti, P., Monteagudo, E., Orsatti, L., Roversi, D., et al. (2021) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01533 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Doig, A. J., & Baldwin, R. L.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1325-1336
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2073745636
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: N‐ and C‐capping preferences for all 20 amino acids in α‐helical peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pro.5560040708
- The paper
- Doig, A. J., & Baldwin, R. L. (1995). N‐ and C‐capping preferences for all 20 amino acids in α‐helical peptides. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560040708
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.