The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein secondary structural types are differentially coded on messenger RNA
Open accessAbstract
Tricodon regions on messenger RNAs corresponding to a set of proteins from Escherichia coli were scrutinized for their translation speed. The fractional frequency values of the individual codons as they occur in mRNAs of highly expressed genes from Escherichia coli were taken as an indicative measure of the translation speed. The tricodons were classified by the sum of the frequency values of the constituent codons. Examination of the conformation of the encoded amino acid residues in the corresponding protein tertiary structures revealed a correlation between codon usage in mRNA and topological features of the encoded proteins. Alpha helices on proteins tend to be preferentially coded by translationally fast mRNA regions while the slow segments often code for beta strands and coil regions. Fast regions correspondingly avoid coding for beta strands and coil regions while the slow regions similarly move away from encoding alpha helices. Structural and mechanistic aspects of the ribosome peptide channel support the relevance of sequence fragment translation and subsequent conformation. A discussion is presented relating the observation to the reported kinetic data on the formation and stabilization of protein secondary structural types during protein folding. The observed absence of such strong positive selection for codons in non‐highly expressed genes is compatible with existing theories that mutation pressure may well dominate codon selection in non‐highly expressed genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles that Govern the Folding of Protein Chains
Anfinsen, C. B. (1973) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.181.4096.223 · Cited by 7,096
Sharp, P. M., & Li, W.-H. (1987) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/15.3.1281 · Cited by 3,992
The molecular basis for the genetic code.
Woese, C. R., Dugre, D. H., Saxinger, W. C., & Dugre, S. A. (1966) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.55.4.966 · Cited by 270
Cited by
Codon optimality, bias and usage in translation and mRNA decay
Hanson, G., & Coller, J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.91 · Cited by 825
Determinants of translation efficiency and accuracy
Gingold, H., & Pilpel, Y. (2011) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2011.14 · Cited by 489
Kramer, G., Boehringer, D., Ban, N., & Bukau, B. (2009) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1614 · Cited by 477
A pause for thought along the co-translational folding pathway
Komar, A. A. (2009) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2008.10.002 · Cited by 349
A code within the genetic code: codon usage regulates co-translational protein folding
Liu, Y. (2020) · Cell Communication and Signaling · doi:10.1186/s12964-020-00642-6 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Thanaraj, T. A., & Argos, P.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1973-1983
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2055536178
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein secondary structural types are differentially coded on messenger RNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pro.5560051003
- The paper
- Thanaraj, T. A., & Argos, P. (1996). Protein secondary structural types are differentially coded on messenger RNA. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560051003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.