Cited by 1Biochemical and Structural CharacterizationAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of the heterogenous structural states of the hexameric ATPase PilU of the type IV pili from Vibrio cholerae

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Type IV pili (T4P) mediate surface motility, host interactions, and DNA uptake through cycles of extension and retraction. While the primary retraction ATPase PilT has been extensively characterized, its homolog PilU remains less well understood despite being demonstrated as a PilT‐dependent retraction ATPase. Here, we determined six PilU structures by cryo‐electron microscopy and x‐ray crystallography. The structures reveal a homohexameric assembly stabilized by interactions between the C‐terminal catalytic domain of one subunit and the N‐terminal PAS‐like domain of a neighboring subunit. PilU adopts multiple conformational states, exhibiting different combinations of open and closed interfaces even in the absence of nucleotide. Comparison with PilT highlights structural features that likely underlie PilU's weak ATPase activity and its dependence on PilT for function. Together, these findings provide a structural framework for understanding PilU's role within the T4P retraction machinery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.70609

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold

    Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · cited 4×

    “The AlphaFold models of PilU were calculated using the Google Colab platform AlphaFold2 (https://colab.research. google.com/github/sokrypton/ColabFold/blob/main/beta/ AlphaFold2_advanced.ipynb) (Jumper et al., 2021) with default settings (num_models = 5, ptm option, num_ensemble = 1, max_cycles = 3, num_relax = 0, tol…”
    Influential
  • Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3

    Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · cited 2×

    “Surface electrostatics analysis was performed using the APBS PyMOL plugin, with default settings corresponding to pH 7 (Jurrus et al., 2018), and PDB2PQR was used to add hydrogens and assign protonation states, atomic charges, and radii (Dolinsky et al., 2004).”

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008393 · DOI
  2. 10.1107/S2059798318006551 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/978-1-0716-0966-8_8 · DOI
  4. 10.1128/mbio.02521-25 · DOI
  5. 10.1107/S1399004714021683 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.269 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.aad2001 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/pro.3967 · DOI
  9. 10.1099/mic.0.2007/011320-0 · DOI
  10. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008448 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg430 · DOI
  12. 10.1107/S0907444907047580 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41579-019-0195-4 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/nrmicro885 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/nar/gkh381 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s41564-018-0174-y · DOI
  17. 10.1107/S0907444904019158 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/s41467-020-15331-8 · DOI
  20. 10.1128/IAI.67.3.1393-1404.1999 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/pro.3235 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.7554/eLife.07380 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/pro.3280 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jsb.2016.08.006 · DOI
  25. 10.1107/S0907444904026460 · DOI
  26. 10.1074/jbc.275.2.1502 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/pro.3289 · DOI
  28. 10.1107/S2059798319011471 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.tim.2020.02.003 · DOI
  30. MaggiS KreidaS YangL TeipenAE LynchDL DaliaAB et al.Integrative structure and function of theVibrio choleraecompetence pilus machine.2025bioRxiv:2025.2010.2014.680967.
  31. 10.1016/j.str.2016.08.010 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41467-019-13070-z · DOI
  33. 10.1038/ncomms15091 · DOI
  34. 10.1107/S0021889807021206 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1126/science.1120096 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/pro.4792 · DOI
  37. 10.1107/S0907444906019949 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.05.066 · DOI
  39. 10.1107/S0907444911001314 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1107/S0907444906005270 · DOI
  42. 10.1107/S0021889805038987 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm076 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/pro.3943 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.jsb.2021.107702 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/nmeth.4169 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.014 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.str.2007.01.018 · DOI
  49. 10.1073/pnas.1315647110 · DOI
  50. 10.1093/protein/11.9.739 · DOI
  51. 10.1007/978-1-4939-0354-2_10 · DOI
  52. 10.1128/mmbr.00076-22 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.03.010 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/nmeth.4347 · DOI
  55. TeipenAE HoltJD LynchDL PengY DaliaTN GumbartJC et al.Structural modeling reveals the mechanism of motor ATPase coordination during type IV pilus retraction. bioRxiv.2025. · DOI
  56. 10.1038/s41592-020-0914-9 · DOI
  57. 10.1107/S0907444909042589 · DOI
  58. 10.7554/eLife.07454 · DOI
  59. 10.1128/JB.181.11.3606-3609.1999 · DOI
  60. 10.1002/pro.3330 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw514 · DOI
  62. 10.1107/S2059798321009475 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Guo, Y., Shukla, S., Minasov, G., Inniss, N. L., Klose, T., Tokars, V. L., Mondragón, A., Otwinowski, Z., Borek, D., & Satchell, K. J. F.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Borek, Dominika
  • Satchell, Karla J. F.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-05-05
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
e70609-e70609
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W7160324748
Cited by
1
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272201700060C, 75N93022C00035)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35 GM118108, R35 GM145365)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐AC02‐06CH11357)
  • Michigan Economic Development Corporation (085P1000817)
  • Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCI P30CA060553)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
pilus, type IV pili, Vibrio cholerae, hexameric ATPase, pilT, conformational heterogeneity, surface motility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review