The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm
Abstract
The development of scoring functions is of great importance to protein docking. Here we present a new scoring function for the initial stage of unbound docking. It combines our recently developed pairwise shape complementarity with desolvation and electrostatics. We compare this scoring function with three other functions on a large benchmark of 49 nonredundant test cases and show its superior performance, especially for the antibody‐antigen category of test cases. For 44 test cases (90% of the benchmark), we can retain at least one near‐native structure within the top 2000 predictions at the 6° rotational sampling density, with an average of 52 near‐native structures per test case. The remaining five difficult test cases can be explained by a combination of poor binding affinity, large backbone conformational changes, and our algorithm's strong tendency for identifying large concave binding pockets. All four scoring functions have been integrated into our Fast Fourier Transform based docking algorithm ZDOCK, which is freely available to academic users at http://zlab.bu.edu/∼rong/dock. Proteins 2003;52:80–87. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“conventional approaches for predicting the structure of protein complexes include a docking component8–11, which is limited by force-field accuracy and the completeness of conformational space sampling.”
From AF2Complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning (2022) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations
Brooks, B., Bruccoleri, R., Olafson, B. D., States, D., Swaminathan, S., & Karplus, M. (1983) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540040211 · Cited by 13,736
The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility
Lee, B., & Richards, F. M. (1971) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-x · Cited by 5,884
Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions
Halperin, I., Ma, B., Wolfson, H., & Nussinov, R. (2002) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10115 · Cited by 1,294
Gabb, H. A., Jackson, R. M., & Sternberg, M. J. E. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.1203 · Cited by 820
Cuff, J. A., & Barton, G. J. (2000) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/1097-0134(20000815)40:3 · Cited by 773
Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins
Zhang, C., Vasmatzis, G., Cornette, J. L., & DeLisi, C. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0859 · Cited by 537
Flexible protein–ligand docking by global energy optimization in internal coordinates
Totrov, M. M., & Abagyan, R. A. (1997) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(1997)1+ · Cited by 451
Prediction of protein–protein interactions by docking methods
Smith, G. R., & Sternberg, M. J. E. (2002) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00285-3 · Cited by 450
Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics
Chen, R., & Weng, Z. (2002) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10092 · Cited by 375
Self-citationA protein–protein docking benchmark
Chen, R., Mintseris, J., Janin, J., & Weng, Z. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10390 · Cited by 345
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1997)1 <226::AID-PROT31>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer
Evans, R., O’Neill, M., Pritzel, A., Antropova, N., Senior, A., Green, T., Žídek, A., Bates, R., Blackwell, S., Yim, J., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · Cited by 3,808
The ClusPro web server for protein–protein docking
Kozakov, D., Hall, D. R., Xia, B., Porter, K. A., Padhorny, D., Yueh, C., Beglov, D., & Vajda, S. (2017) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.169 · Cited by 3,297
Insights into Protein–Ligand Interactions: Mechanisms, Models, and Methods
Du, X., Li, Y., Xia, Y.-L., Ai, S.-M., Liang, J., Sang, P., Ji, X., & Liu, S.-Q. (2016) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms17020144 · Cited by 1,765
Software for molecular docking: a review
Pagadala, N. S., Syed, K., & Tuszynski, J. (2017) · Biophysical Reviews · doi:10.1007/s12551-016-0247-1 · Cited by 1,522
The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking
de Vries, S. J., van Dijk, M., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2010) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2010.32 · Cited by 1,387
Putnam, C. D., Hammel, M., Hura, G. L., & Tainer, J. A. (2007) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583507004635 · Cited by 1,184
PIPER: An FFT‐based protein docking program with pairwise potentials
Kozakov, D., Brenke, R., Comeau, S. R., & Vajda, S. (2006) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21117 · Cited by 865
ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes
Comeau, S. R., GATCHELL, D. W., Vajda, S., & Camacho, C. J. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg371 · Cited by 857
ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein-protein docking
Comeau, S. R., GATCHELL, D. W., Vajda, S., & Camacho, C. J. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh354 · Cited by 826
Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: A Review
Dara, S., Dhamercherla, S., Jadav, S. S., Babu, C. M., & Ahsan, M. J. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-021-10058-4 · Cited by 893
How good is automated protein docking?
Kozakov, D., Beglov, D., Bohnuud, T., Mottarella, S. E., Xia, B., Hall, D. R., & Vajda, S. (2013) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24403 · Cited by 748
FireDock: a web server for fast interaction refinement in molecular docking
Mashiach, E., Schneidman‐Duhovny, D., Andrusier, N., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn186 · Cited by 742
Performance and Its Limits in Rigid Body Protein-Protein Docking
Desta, I., Porter, K. A., Xia, B., Kozakov, D., & Vajda, S. (2020) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2020.06.006 · Cited by 709
Virtual Screening Strategies in Drug Discovery: A Critical Review
Lavecchia, A., & Giovanni, C. D. (2013) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/09298673113209990001 · Cited by 712
FireDock: Fast interaction refinement in molecular docking
Andrusier, N., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2007) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21495 · Cited by 679
HexServer: an FFT-based protein docking server powered by graphics processors
Macindoe, G., Mavridis, L., Venkatraman, V., Devignes, M., & Ritchie, D. W. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq311 · Cited by 674
Accelerating Protein Docking in ZDOCK Using an Advanced 3D Convolution Library
Pierce, B. G., Hourai, Y., & Weng, Z. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024657 · Cited by 645
Self-citationFan, J., Fu, A., & Zhang, L. (2019) · Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1007/s40484-019-0172-y · Cited by 665
New additions to the C lus P ro server motivated by CAPRI
Vajda, S., Yueh, C., Beglov, D., Bohnuud, T., Mottarella, S. E., Xia, B., Hall, D. R., & Kozakov, D. (2016) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25219 · Cited by 601
The RosettaDock server for local protein-protein docking
Lyskov, S., & Gray, J. J. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn216 · Cited by 593
Chae, J. J., Wood, G., Masters, S. L., Richard, K., Park, G. S. H., Smith, B. J., & Kastner, D. L. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0602081103 · Cited by 563
Protein–protein docking benchmark version 4.0
Hwang, H., Vreven, T., Janin, J., & Weng, Z. (2010) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22830 · Cited by 474
Self-citationDockQ: A Quality Measure for Protein-Protein Docking Models
Basu, S., & Wallner, B. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 · Cited by 460
ZRANK: Reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function
Pierce, B., & Weng, Z. (2007) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21373 · Cited by 468
Self-citationAdenosine A2A-Dopamine D2 Receptor-Receptor Heteromerization
Canals, M., Marcellino, D. J., Fanelli, F., Ciruela, F., de Benedetti, P., Goldberg, S. R., Neve, K. A., Fuxé, K., Agnati, L. F., Woods, A. S., et al. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m306451200 · Cited by 444
Vreven, T., Moal, I. H., Vangone, A., Pierce, B. G., Kastritis, P. L., Torchala, M., Chaleil, R., Jiménez-García, B., Bates, P. A., Fernandez-Recio, J., et al. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2015.07.016 · Cited by 424
Self-citationMolecular modeling in drug discovery
Adelusi, T. I., Oyedele, A.-Q. K., Boyenle, I. D., Ogunlana, A. T., Adeyemi, R. O., Divine, U. C., Idris, M. O., Olaoba, O. T., Adedotun, I. O., Oladipo, E. K., et al. (2022) · Informatics in Medicine Unlocked · doi:10.1016/j.imu.2022.100880 · Cited by 423
Benchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants
Yin, R., Feng, B. Y., Varshney, A., & Pierce, B. G. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4379 · Cited by 335
Ultra-fast FFT protein docking on graphics processors
Ritchie, D. W., & Venkatraman, V. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq444 · Cited by 368
Crystal contacts as nature's docking solutions
Krissinel, E. (2009) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21303 · Cited by 373
An iterative knowledge‐based scoring function for protein–protein recognition
Huang, S., & Zou, X. (2008) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21949 · Cited by 336
Benchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants
Yin, R., Feng, B. Y., Varshney, A., & Pierce, B. G. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.23.465575 · Cited by 335
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technology Driven Modern Drug Discovery and Development
Sarkar, C., Das, B., Rawat, V. S., Wahlang, J. B., Nongpiur, A., Tiewsoh, I., Lyngdoh, N. M., Das, D., Bidarolli, M., & Sony, H. T. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24032026 · Cited by 347
CPORT: A Consensus Interface Predictor and Its Performance in Prediction-Driven Docking with HADDOCK
de Vries, S. J., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017695 · Cited by 319
Recent Progress and Future Directions in Protein-Protein Docking
Ritchie, D. W. (2008) · Current Protein and Peptide Science · doi:10.2174/138920308783565741 · Cited by 314
Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction
Mintseris, J., Pierce, B., Wiehe, K., Anderson, R., Chen, R., & Weng, Z. (2007) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21502 · Cited by 334
Self-citationStructural Basis for Substrate Targeting and Catalysis by Fungal Polysaccharide Monooxygenases
Li, X., Beeson, W. T., Phillips, C. M., Marletta, M. A., & Cate, J. H. D. (2012) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2012.04.002 · Cited by 293
Status of GPCR Modeling and Docking as Reflected by Community-wide GPCR Dock 2010 Assessment
Kufareva, I., Rueda, M., Katritch, V., Stevens, R. C., & Abagyan, R. A. (2011) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2011.05.012 · Cited by 282
Lee, S., Lee, H.-C., Kwon, Y., Lee, S. E., Cho, Y., Kim, J., Lee, S., Kim, J., Lee, J., Yang, H., et al. (2014) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2014.01.013 · Cited by 280
Protein–protein docking benchmark 2.0: An update
Mintseris, J., Wiehe, K. J., Pierce, B. G., Anderson, R., Chen, R., Janin, J., & Weng, Z. (2005) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20560 · Cited by 278
Self-citationArtificial intelligence in drug design
Zhong, F., Xing, J., Li, X., Liu, X., Fu, Z., Xiong, Z., Lu, D., Wu, X., Zhao, J., Tan, X., et al. (2018) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-018-9342-2 · Cited by 293
Modeling and docking of antibody structures with Rosetta
Weitzner, B. D., Jeliazkov, J. R., Lyskov, S., Marze, N. A., Kuroda, D., Frick, R., Adolf‐Bryfogle, J., Biswas, N., Dunbrack, R. L., & Gray, J. J. (2017) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.180 · Cited by 266
Tunçbağ, N., Gürsoy, A., Nussinov, R., & Keskin, Ö. (2011) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.367 · Cited by 264
AF2Complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning
Gao, M., Nakajima An, D., Parks, J. M., & Skolnick, J. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29394-2 · Cited by 252
A structural perspective on protein?protein interactions
Russell, R. B., Alber, F., Aloy, P., Davis, F. P., Korkin, D., Pichaud, M., Topf, M., & Šali, A. (2004) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2004.04.006 · Cited by 267
CotH3 mediates fungal invasion of host cells during mucormycosis
Gebremariam, T., Liu, M., Luo, G., Bruno, V. M., Phan, Q. T., Waring, A. J., Edwards, J. E., Filler, S. G., Yeaman, M. R., & Ibrahim, A. S. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci71349 · Cited by 262
De novo design of protein interactions with learned surface fingerprints
Gaínza, P., Wehrle, S., Hall‐Beauvais, A. V., Marchand, A., Scheck, A., Harteveld, Z., Buckley, S., Ni, D., Tan, S., Sverrisson, F., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05993-x · Cited by 266
Preza, G. C., Ruchala, P., Pinon, R., Ramos, E., Qiao, B., Peralta, M. A., Sharma, S., Waring, A., Ganz, T., & Nemeth, E. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci57693 · Cited by 234
Ying, T., Du, L., Ju, T. W., Prabakaran, P., Lau, C. C. Y., Lu, L., Liu, Q., Wang, L., Feng, Y., Wang, Y., et al. (2014) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00912-14 · Cited by 233
Principles of flexible protein–protein docking
Andrusier, N., Mashiach, E., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2008) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22170 · Cited by 229
Antibody-protein interactions: benchmark datasets and prediction tools evaluation
Ponomarenko, J. V., & Bourne, P. E. (2007) · BMC Structural Biology · doi:10.1186/1472-6807-7-64 · Cited by 226
Computational approaches to therapeutic antibody design: established methods and emerging trends
Norman, R. A., Ambrosetti, F., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., Colwell, L. J., Kelm, S., Kumar, S., & Krawczyk, K. (2020) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz095 · Cited by 219
“antibody-specific ClusPro [8, 126], SnugDock [9, 89] and general protein HADDOCK [131, 132], ZDOCK [130]) and the scoring step, where the conformations are ranked according to a specific scoring function (e.”
BackgroundMethodPrinciples and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics
Maximova, T., Moffatt, R., Ma, B., Nussinov, R., & Shehu, A. (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004619 · Cited by 214
Recent Advances in Molecular Docking for the Research and Discovery of Potential Marine Drugs
Chen, G., Seukep, A. J., & Guo, M. (2020) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md18110545 · Cited by 231
Application of asymmetric statistical potentials to antibody-protein docking
Brenke, R., Hall, D., Chuang, G., Comeau, S. R., Bohnuud, T., Beglov, D., Schueler-Furman, O., Vajda, S., & Kozakov, D. (2012) · Bioinform. · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts493 · Cited by 205
Benchmarking of different molecular docking methods for protein-peptide docking
Singh, S., Srivastava, H. K., Kishor, G., Singh, S., Agrawal, P., & Raghava, G. P. S. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-018-2449-y · Cited by 212
Protein-protein docking using region-based 3D Zernike descriptors
Venkatraman, V., Yang, Y. D., Sael, L., & Kihara, D. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-407 · Cited by 203
Ritchie, D. W., Kozakov, D., & Vajda, S. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn334 · Cited by 201
Structure-based mutagenesis reveals the albumin-binding site of the neonatal Fc receptor
Andersen, J. T., Dalhus, B., Cameron, J., Daba, M. B., Plumridge, A., Evans, L. R., Brennan, S. O., Gunnarsen, K. S., Bjørås, M., Sleep, D., et al. (2012) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1607 · Cited by 206
M-ZDOCK: a grid-based approach for Cn symmetric multimer docking
Pierce, B. G., Tong, W., & Weng, Z. (2004) · Computer applications in the biosciences · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti229 · Cited by 196
Self-citationStructural basis for glycyl radical formation by pyruvate formate-lyase activating enzyme
Vey, J. L., Yang, J., Li, M., Broderick, W. E., Broderick, J. B., & Drennan, C. L. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0806640105 · Cited by 194
Huang, S.-Y., & Zou, X. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku077 · Cited by 195
Peptide and peptide-based inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 entry
Schütz, D., Ruiz‐Blanco, Y. B., Münch, J., Kirchhoff, F., Sánchez‐García, E., & Müller, J. A. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.11.007 · Cited by 180
Impeding the interaction between Nur77 and p38 reduces LPS-induced inflammation
Li, L., Liu, Y., Chen, H., Li, F.-W., Wu, J., Zhang, H.-K., He, J., Xing, Y.-Z., Chen, Y., Wang, W.-J., et al. (2015) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1788 · Cited by 176
Self-citationImproving B-cell epitope prediction and its application to global antibody–antigen docking
Krawczyk, K., Liu, X., Baker, T., Shi, J., & Deane, C. M. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu190 · Cited by 174
Protein-Protein Complex Structure Predictions by Multimeric Threading and Template Recombination
Mukherjee, S., & Zhang, Y. (2011) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2011.04.006 · Cited by 174
Interaction-site prediction for protein complexes: a critical assessment
Zhou, H., & Qin, S. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm323 · Cited by 170
Computational Modeling Approaches to Structure−Function Analysis of G Protein-Coupled Receptors
Fanelli, F., & Benedetti, P. G. D. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr000095n · Cited by 169
Chaudhury, S., & Gray, J. J. (2008) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.042 · Cited by 169
The Structure and Function of Frataxin
Bencze, K. Z., Kondapalli, K. C., Cook, J. D., McMahon, S., Millán‐Pacheco, C., Pastor, N., & Stemmler, T. L. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409230600846058 · Cited by 164
Search strategies and evaluation in protein–protein docking: principles, advances and challenges
Huang, S. (2014) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2014.02.005 · Cited by 164
Kinghorn, A. B., Fraser, L. A., Liang, S., Shiu, S. C., & Tanner, J. A. (2017) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms18122516 · Cited by 169
RosettaAntibody: antibody variable region homology modeling server
Sircar, A., Kim, E. T., & Gray, J. J. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp387 · Cited by 161
FRODOCK: a new approach for fast rotational protein–protein docking
Garzón, J. I., López‐Blanco, J. R., Pons, C., Kovacs, J., Abagyan, R. A., Fernández‐Recio, J., & Chacón, P. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp447 · Cited by 161
Integrating Structure-Based and Ligand-Based Approaches for Computational Drug Design
Wilson, G. L., & Lill, M. A. (2011) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc.11.18 · Cited by 167
Abascal, F., & Zardoya, R. (2012) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201100173 · Cited by 158
Accounting for conformational changes during protein–protein docking
Zacharias, M. (2010) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2010.02.001 · Cited by 155
Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation
Singh, S., Baker, Q. B., & Singh, D. B. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-89775-4.00014-6 · Cited by 151
Data‐driven docking for the study of biomolecular complexes
van Dijk, A. D. J., Boelens, R., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2004) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2004.04473.x · Cited by 151
Design and application of implicit solvent models in biomolecular simulations
Kleinjung, J., & Fraternali, F. (2014) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.04.003 · Cited by 147
Receptor-based virtual screening protocol for drug discovery
Cerqueira, N. M. F. S. A., Gesto, D., Oliveira, E. F., Santos‐Martins, D., Brás, N. F., Sousa, S. F., Fernandes, P. A., & Ramos, M. J. (2015) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/j.abb.2015.05.011 · Cited by 151
A combination of rescoring and refinement significantly improves protein docking performance
Pierce, B. G., & Weng, Z. (2008) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21920 · Cited by 142
Self-citationLearning context-aware structural representations to predict antigen and antibody binding interfaces
Pittala, S., & Bailey‐Kellogg, C. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa263 · Cited by 142
Hou, X., Du, J., Zhang, J., Du, L., Fang, H., & Li, M. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci300417y · Cited by 139
Stability and Binding Properties of a Modified Thrombin Binding Aptamer
Pagano, B., Martino, L., Randazzo, A., & Giancola, C. (2007) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.117382 · Cited by 137
Engineering a Stable and Selective Peptide Blocker of the Kv1.3 Channel in T Lymphocytes
Pennington, M. W., Beeton, C., Galea, C. A., Smith, B. J., Chi, V., Monaghan, K. P., Garcia, A., Rangaraju, S., Giuffrida, A., Plank, D. W., et al. (2009) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.108.052704 · Cited by 137
Structural analysis and modeling reveals new mechanisms governing ESCRT-III spiral filament assembly
Shen, Q.-T., Schuh, A. L., Zheng, Y., Quinney, K., Wang, L., Hanna, M., Mitchell, J. C., Otegui, M. S., Ahlquist, P., Cui, Q., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201403108 · Cited by 135
Han, S. H., Yin, S., Yin, S.-J., Chen, Z., Liu, H., Cao, Z., Wu, Y., & Li, W. (2008) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m802054200 · Cited by 134
Vogeley, L., Arnaout, T. E., Bailey, J., Stansfeld, P. J., Boland, C., & Caffrey, M. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad3747 · Cited by 134
Machine Learning Methods for Protein Structure Prediction
Cheng, J., Tegge, A. N., & Baldi, P. (2008) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2008.2008239 · Cited by 139
MolDock Applied to Structure-Based Virtual Screening
de Azevedo, W. F. (2010) · Current Drug Targets · doi:10.2174/138945010790711941 · Cited by 136
Community-Wide Assessment of Protein-Interface Modeling Suggests Improvements to Design Methodology
Fleishman, S. J., Whitehead, T. A., Strauch, E., Corn, J. E., Qin, S., Zhou, H., Mitchell, J. C., Demerdash, O., Takeda‐Shitaka, M., Terashi, G., et al. (2011) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2011.09.031 · Cited by 132
Self-citationIn-Silico Evidence for a Two Receptor Based Strategy of SARS-CoV-2
Milanetti, E., Miotto, M., Rienzo, L. D., Nagaraj, M., Monti, M., Golbek, T. W., Gosti, G., Roeters, S. J., Weidner, T., Otzen, D. E., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.690655 · Cited by 133
Chen, Z., Hu, Y., Yang, W., He, Y., Feng, J. Q., Wang, B., Zhao, R., Ding, J., Cao, Z., Li, W., et al. (2012) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m112.343996 · Cited by 131
Li, X., Yang, Y., Jiang, F., Hu, G., Wan, S., Yan, W., He, X., Xiao, F., Yang, X., Guo, X., et al. (2024) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113688 · Cited by 149
Molecular basis for antagonistic activity of anifrolumab, an anti-interferon–α receptor 1 antibody
Peng, L., Oganesyan, V., Wu, H., Dall’Acqua, W. F., & Damschroder, M. M. (2015) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2015.1007810 · Cited by 128
Lobedanz, S., Bokma, E., Symmons, M. F., Koronakis, E., Hughes, C., & Koronakis, V. E. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0610160104 · Cited by 128
WD40 Repeat Propellers Define a Ubiquitin-Binding Domain that Regulates Turnover of F Box Proteins
Pashkova, N., Gakhar, L., Winistorfer, S. C., Yu, L. P., Ramaswamy, S., & Piper, R. C. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.10.018 · Cited by 130
Protein–protein docking dealing with the unknown
Moreira, I. S., Fernandes, P. A., & Ramos, M. J. (2009) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21276 · Cited by 132
Jonas, K., Fanelli, F., Huhtaniemi, I. T., & Hanyaloglu, A. C. (2014) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m114.622498 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, R., Li, L., & Weng, Z.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weng, Zhiping
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-05-14
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-87
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2133712572
- Cited by
- 1,393
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 99 · 2012: 69
- FWCI
- 9.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- protein docking, scoring functions, ZDOCK, desolvation, electrostatics, antibody-antigen binding, conformational change
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Antibodies, Antigens, Binding Sites, Enzyme Inhibitors, Enzymes, Models, Molecular, Proteins, Protein Interaction Mapping, Macromolecular Substances, Static Electricity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review