The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydration of protein–protein interfaces
Abstract
We present an analysis of the water molecules immobilized at the protein–protein interfaces of 115 homodimeric proteins and 46 protein–protein complexes, and compare them with 173 large crystal packing interfaces representing nonspecific interactions. With an average of 15 waters per 1000 Å 2 of interface area, the crystal packing interfaces are more hydrated than the specific interfaces of homodimers and complexes, which have 10–11 waters per 1000 Å 2, reflecting the more hydrophilic composition of crystal packing interfaces. Very different patterns of hydration are observed: Water molecules may form a ring around interfaces that remain “dry,” or they may permeate “wet” interfaces. A majority of the specific interfaces are dry and most of the crystal packing interfaces are wet, but counterexamples exist in both categories. Water molecules at interfaces form hydrogen bonds with protein groups, with a preference for the main‐chain carbonyl and the charged side‐chains of Glu, Asp, and Arg. These interactions are essentially the same in specific and nonspecific interfaces, and very similar to those observed elsewhere on the protein surface. Water‐mediated polar interactions are as abundant at the interfaces as direct protein–protein hydrogen bonds, and they may contribute to the stability of the assembly. Proteins 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of protein-protein interactions
Jones, S., & Thornton, J. M. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.1.13 · Cited by 2,684
Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces
Bogan, A. A., & Thorn, K. S. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.1843 · Cited by 1,988
Guerois, R., Nielsen, J. E., & Serrano, L. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00442-4 · Cited by 1,728
Cited by
Putnam, C. D., Hammel, M., Hura, G. L., & Tainer, J. A. (2007) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583507004635 · Cited by 1,184
WATER MEDIATION IN PROTEIN FOLDING AND MOLECULAR RECOGNITION
Levy, Y., & Onuchic, J. N. (2006) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.35.040405.102134 · Cited by 1,048
The Structural Basis of Peptide-Protein Binding Strategies
London, N., Movshovitz-Attias, D., & Schueler-Furman, O. (2010) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2009.11.012 · Cited by 416
Structural and thermodynamic analysis of the GFP:GFP‐nanobody complex
Kubala, M. H., Kovtun, O., Alexandrov, K., & Collins, B. M. (2010) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.519 · Cited by 400
Protein–protein interaction and quaternary structure
Janin, J., Bahadur, R. P., & Chakrabarti, P. (2008) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583508004708 · Cited by 398
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodier, F., Bahadur, R. P., Chakrabarti, P., & Janin, J.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04-26
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-45
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2052466177
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.