The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures
Abstract
The accurate identification of ligand binding sites in protein structures can be valuable in determining protein function. Once the binding site is known, it becomes easier to perform in silico and experimental procedures that may allow the ligand type and the protein function to be determined. For example, binding pocket shape analysis relies heavily on the correct localization of the ligand binding site. We have developed SURFNET‐ConSurf, a modular, two‐stage method for identifying the location and shape of potential ligand binding pockets in protein structures. In the first stage, the SURFNET program identifies clefts in the protein surface that are potential binding sites. In the second stage, these clefts are trimmed in size by cutting away regions distant from highly conserved residues, as defined by the ConSurf‐HSSP database. The largest clefts that remain tend to be those where ligands bind. To test the approach, we analyzed a nonredundant set of 244 protein structures from the PDB and found that SURFNET‐ConSurf identifies a ligand binding pocket in 75% of them. The trimming procedure reduces the original cleft volumes by 30% on average, while still encompassing an average 87% of the ligand volume. From the analysis of the results we conclude that for those cases in which the ligands are found in large, highly conserved clefts, the combined SURFNET‐ConSurf method gives pockets that are a better match to the ligand shape and location. We also show that this approach works better for enzymes than for nonenzyme proteins. Proteins 2006. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular Docking: A Powerful Approach for Structure-Based Drug Discovery
Meng, X.-Y., Zhang, H.-X., Mezei, M., & Cui, M. (2011) · Current Computer Aided-Drug Design · doi:10.2174/157340911795677602 · Cited by 3,771
Brenke, R., Kozakov, D., Chuang, G.-Y., Beglov, D., Hall, D., Landon, M. R., Mattos, C., & Vajda, S. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp036 · Cited by 455
A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation
Brylinski, M., & Skolnick, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707684105 · Cited by 333
Causes of evolutionary rate variation among protein sites
Echave, J., Spielman, S. J., & Wilke, C. O. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2015.18 · Cited by 328
Structural Biology and Drug Discovery of Difficult Targets: The Limits of Ligandability
Surade, S., & Blundell, T. L. (2012) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.12.013 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Glaser, F., Morris, R. J., Najmanovich, R. J., Laskowski, R. A., & Thornton, J. M.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11-22
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 479-488
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2133990057
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prot.20769
- The paper
- Glaser, F., Morris, R. J., Najmanovich, R. J., Laskowski, R. A., & Thornton, J. M. (2006). A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20769
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.