Cited by 234Computational Drug Discovery MethodsEnzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and Dynamics

Structural Biology and Drug Discovery of Difficult Targets: The Limits of Ligandability

Open access
Surade, Sachin, Blundell, Tom L.·2012·Chemistry & Biology

Abstract

Over the past decade, researchers in the pharmaceutical industry and academia have made retrospective analyses of successful drug campaigns in order to establish "rules" to guide the selection of new target proteins. They have identified features that are considered undesirable and some that make targets "unligandable." This review focuses on the factors that make targets difficult: featureless binding sites, the lack of hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors, the presence of metal ions, the need for adaptive changes in conformation, and the lipophilicity of residues at the protein-ligand interface. Protein-protein interfaces of multiprotein assemblies share many of these undesirable features, although those that involve concerted binding and folding in their assembly have better defined pockets or grooves, and these can provide opportunities for identifying hits and for lead optimization. In some protein-protein interfaces conformational changes-often involving rearrangement of large side chains such as those of tyrosine, tryptophan, or arginine-are required to configure an appropriate binding site, and this may require tethering of the ligands until higher affinity is achieved. In many enzymes, larger conformational rearrangements are required to form the binding site, and these can make fragment-based approaches particularly difficult.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.12.013

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some proteins within a family lack binding sites that are compatible with drugs or can bind ligands.

    “not all members of a protein family have drug-compatible or ligandable21 binding sites”

    From Unexplored therapeutic opportunities in the human genome (2018) · cites this paper as [21]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Surade, S., & Blundell, T. L.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Blundell, Tom L.
Venue
Chemistry & Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
42-50
ISSN
1074-5521 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084501039
Cited by
230
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemistry & Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Wellcome Trust
  • European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
ligandability, target selection, protein binding sites, hydrogen bond donors and acceptors, protein conformational change, protein-protein interfaces, fragment-based drug discovery, lead optimization
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Ligands, Proteins, Catalytic Domain, BRCA2 Protein, Protein Interaction Mapping, Rad51 Recombinase, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review