Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FiberDock: Flexible induced‐fit backbone refinement in molecular docking

Open access
Mashiach, Efrat, Nussinov, Ruth, Wolfson, Haim J.·2010·Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics

Abstract

Upon binding, proteins undergo conformational changes. These changes often prevent rigid‐body docking methods from predicting the 3D structure of a complex from the unbound conformations of its proteins. Handling protein backbone flexibility is a major challenge for docking methodologies, as backbone flexibility adds a huge number of degrees of freedom to the search space, and therefore considerably increases the running time of docking algorithms. Normal mode analysis permits description of protein flexibility as a linear combination of discrete movements (modes). Low‐frequency modes usually describe the large‐scale conformational changes of the protein. Therefore, many docking methods model backbone flexibility by using only few modes, which have the lowest frequencies. However, studies show that due to molecular interactions, many proteins also undergo local and small‐scale conformational changes, which are described by high‐frequency normal modes. Here we present a new method, FiberDock, for docking refinement which models backbone flexibility by an unlimited number of normal modes. The method iteratively minimizes the structure of the flexible protein along the most relevant modes. The relevance of a mode is calculated according to the correlation between the chemical forces, applied on each atom, and the translation vector of each atom, according to the normal mode. The results show that the method successfully models backbone movements that occur during molecular interactions and considerably improves the accuracy and the ranking of rigid‐docking models of protein–protein complexes. A web server for the FiberDock method is available at: http://bioinfo3d.cs.tau.ac.il/FiberDock. Proteins 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prot.22668

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Mashiach, E., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J.
Venue
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-14
Volume
78
Issue
6
Pages
1503-1519
ISSN
  • 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0134
OpenAlex
W2090183113
Cited by
187
References
6
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FiberDock: Flexible induced‐fit backbone refinement in molecular docking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prot.22668
The paper
Mashiach, E., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2010). FiberDock: Flexible induced‐fit backbone refinement in molecular docking. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22668

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.